Development and validation of the Career Inaction Scale

Abstract Career inaction is the phenomenon in which people do not take sufficient action to realize a desired change in their career. Despite recent theoretical advancements and strong indications that career inaction is a prevalent phenomenon that brings along important risks to both individuals and organizations, there is no reliable and valid scale to accurately measure it. Therefore, we developed and validated an eight‐item scale of career inaction (CARINAS) across four studies. In Study 1 ( N = 258), we pilot‐tested the reliability and factor structure of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian workers. In Study 2 ( N = 799), we tested the reliability, measurement invariance across groups, and construct validity of the scale and started exploring the nomological network of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian career counseling clients. In Study 3 ( N = 170), we tested the reliability and validity of the English CARINAS and reran the correlation tests from Study 2 among US workers. Finally, in Study 4 ( N = 198), we re‐tested the factor structure and reliability of our scale and further explored the nomological network of the Dutch‐ CARINAS in a two‐wave dataset collected with Belgian workers. The results of these four studies revealed that the CARINAS has high reliability and a good factor structure across different groups. Furthermore, the tests of the nomological network yielded interesting insights regarding the assumptions underlying the theory of career inaction. By developing and validating the CARINAS, our study adds to the research on (barriers to) career transitions, paves the way for further empirical research on career inaction, and provides a diagnostic tool for professionals guiding people in their career decision‐making process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychology
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12590
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the Career Inaction Scale

Paulien D'Huyvetter, Jos Akkermans, Marijke Verbruggen, Xinhui Jing
9 citations
Applied Psychology
Career Development and Diversity
4.73
article

Development and validation of the Career Inaction Scale

Paulien D'Huyvetter, Jos Akkermans, Marijke Verbruggen, Xinhui Jing
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Career inaction is the phenomenon in which people do not take sufficient action to realize a desired change in their career. Despite recent theoretical advancements and strong indications that career inaction is a prevalent phenomenon that brings along important risks to both individuals and organizations, there is no reliable and valid scale to accurately measure it. Therefore, we developed and validated an eight‐item scale of career inaction (CARINAS) across four studies. In Study 1 ( N = 258), we pilot‐tested the reliability and factor structure of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian workers. In Study 2 ( N = 799), we tested the reliability, measurement invariance across groups, and construct validity of the scale and started exploring the nomological network of the Dutch CARINAS among Belgian career counseling clients. In Study 3 ( N = 170), we tested the reliability and validity of the English CARINAS and reran the correlation tests from Study 2 among US workers. Finally, in Study 4 ( N = 198), we re‐tested the factor structure and reliability of our scale and further explored the nomological network of the Dutch‐ CARINAS in a two‐wave dataset collected with Belgian workers. The results of these four studies revealed that the CARINAS has high reliability and a good factor structure across different groups. Furthermore, the tests of the nomological network yielded interesting insights regarding the assumptions underlying the theory of career inaction. By developing and validating the CARINAS, our study adds to the research on (barriers to) career transitions, paves the way for further empirical research on career inaction, and provides a diagnostic tool for professionals guiding people in their career decision‐making process.

Applied PsychologyVol. 74(1)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Career Development and Diversity
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.