Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain

Summary A large number of concepts have been proposed to describe social skills and explain social goal attainment. In this work, we identified dozens of such concepts, which have been studied for many decades across a wide variety of social science disciplines. It has been suggested that the social skills literature lacks parsimony and conceptual clarity. We take stock of these challenges and describe their origins. We identify three conceptual limitations that impede progress studying social skills and social goal attainment: redundancy (i.e., jangle fallacy), conflation (i.e., haphazard mixing of different conceptual types), and drift (i.e., jingle fallacy). We used best practices for concept revision and development, assisted by the use of machine learning, to undertake domain‐level conceptual clarification, analyzing 756 definitions across six decades of research. This process led us to propose 15 core social skills‐related concepts (a 42% reduction). These concepts were located within the social skills framework to begin to depict how they might relate to one another during the pursuit of social goals. This paper contributes to theory by decluttering, organizing, and simplifying the messy and redundant social skills literature and, by doing so, improves theoretical clarity. We close by suggesting areas for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2846
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain

Allison Toth, George C. Banks, Eric D. Heggestad, R. Ross
3 citations
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
5.68
article

Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain

Allison Toth, George C. Banks, Eric D. Heggestad, R. Ross
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Summary A large number of concepts have been proposed to describe social skills and explain social goal attainment. In this work, we identified dozens of such concepts, which have been studied for many decades across a wide variety of social science disciplines. It has been suggested that the social skills literature lacks parsimony and conceptual clarity. We take stock of these challenges and describe their origins. We identify three conceptual limitations that impede progress studying social skills and social goal attainment: redundancy (i.e., jangle fallacy), conflation (i.e., haphazard mixing of different conceptual types), and drift (i.e., jingle fallacy). We used best practices for concept revision and development, assisted by the use of machine learning, to undertake domain‐level conceptual clarification, analyzing 756 definitions across six decades of research. This process led us to propose 15 core social skills‐related concepts (a 42% reduction). These concepts were located within the social skills framework to begin to depict how they might relate to one another during the pursuit of social goals. This paper contributes to theory by decluttering, organizing, and simplifying the messy and redundant social skills literature and, by doing so, improves theoretical clarity. We close by suggesting areas for future research.

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVol. 46(3)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), James Madison University (US), Tennessee Technological University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
5.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain — Allison Toth, George C. Banks, et al. · Journal of Organizational Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS