Factor analysis of the Leary Impostorism Scale in professional psychology trainees

Trainee psychologists, like those completing a postgraduate master’s programmes are vulnerable to experiencing impostorism. To help assess this risk and develop intervention strategies, there is a need for a brief validated measure of impostorism. The Leary Impostorism Scale (LIS) is a brief self-report measure that demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties but has not been validated with trainees undertaking professional psychology training. The current study involves an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the LIS and describes levels of impostorism in a sample of Australian trainee psychologists. Participants were 161 postgraduate students enrolled in their first year of a psychology master’s programme. A maximum likelihood (ML) EFA revealed a single factor accounted for 73.67% of total variance. Parallel analysis verified the unidimensional model. A Cronbach’s α of .94, was obtained indicating high internal consistency. Overall, the sample scored at ‘moderate’ levels with 23% having high levels of impostorism. Further research is required to investigate further item reduction of the LIS due to high internal consistency. In addition, to clarifying factors that may account for differences between levels of impostorism between participants in different training programmes, there is a need to develop and assess interventions to reduce the negative effects of impostorism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20556365241297475
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factor analysis of the Leary Impostorism Scale in professional psychology trainees

Olivia E. Clark, Frank Patrick Deane, Judy A. Pickard, Craig J. Gonsalvez et al.
4 citations
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
2.56
article

Factor analysis of the Leary Impostorism Scale in professional psychology trainees

Olivia E. Clark, Frank Patrick Deane, Judy A. Pickard, Craig J. Gonsalvez, James Kirby Martin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Trainee psychologists, like those completing a postgraduate master’s programmes are vulnerable to experiencing impostorism. To help assess this risk and develop intervention strategies, there is a need for a brief validated measure of impostorism. The Leary Impostorism Scale (LIS) is a brief self-report measure that demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties but has not been validated with trainees undertaking professional psychology training. The current study involves an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the LIS and describes levels of impostorism in a sample of Australian trainee psychologists. Participants were 161 postgraduate students enrolled in their first year of a psychology master’s programme. A maximum likelihood (ML) EFA revealed a single factor accounted for 73.67% of total variance. Parallel analysis verified the unidimensional model. A Cronbach’s α of .94, was obtained indicating high internal consistency. Overall, the sample scored at ‘moderate’ levels with 23% having high levels of impostorism. Further research is required to investigate further item reduction of the LIS due to high internal consistency. In addition, to clarifying factors that may account for differences between levels of impostorism between participants in different training programmes, there is a need to develop and assess interventions to reduce the negative effects of impostorism.

Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in SchoolsVol. 34(4)
University of Wollongong (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
2.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.