Comparative Analysis of the Treatment Outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in Functional Dyspepsia: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastric neuromuscular disorder affecting approximately 20% of the global population, with significant economic implications, particularly in India, where prevalence rates vary between 7.6% and 49%. Characterized by epigastric pain, early satiety, and postprandial fullness, FD lacks identifiable anatomical abnormalities, complicating treatment. Prokinetic agents like Itopride and Acotiamide are commonly used, but face variability in treatment. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Itopride versus Acotiamide in managing FD symptoms in a real-world Indian context. Methods: This retrospective study analysed prospectively maintained data (from January to August 2024) across three sites in India. Seventy-nine patients (57 on Itopride and 22 on Acotiamide) were assessed for symptom improvement at 4 and 8-weeks post-treatment initiation, using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM). Symptom severity grades were compared between treatment groups using the Fischer exact or Chi-square test. Results: The mean age of FD patients was 45.59 years, with 46.8% male and demographic parameters were similar across both treatment groups. Itopride treatment significantly reduced symptom severity for epigastric pain, burning, early satiation, and postprandial fullness (p≤0.05) compared to the baseline, while Acotiamide showed non-significant improvements at both 4 and 8 weeks. Between treatment, comparison found fewer high symptom severity grades with Itopride than Acotiamide treatment (e.g. 1.75% vs. 13.64%, p=0.003, for epigastric pain, 8 weeks treatment). Also, after 8 weeks, 61.4% of Itopride patients reported symptom resolution, contrasted with 31.82% in the Acotiamide group. Adverse events were mild and infrequent in both groups, indicating comparable safety profiles. Conclusion: This study provides valuable real-world evidence supporting the use of Itopride as a preferred treatment option for FD in India. Further research is warranted to establish long-term efficacy and safety across diverse populations. Keywords: Functional Dyspepsia; Itopride; Acotiamide; Prokinetic Agents; Symptom Severity Grades

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54136/erwej-0404-10087
Primary Topic
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Treatment Outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in Functional Dyspepsia: A Real-World Retrospective Study

B. Ravi Shankar, Sanjay Bandyopadhyay, Omesh Goyal
Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
article

Comparative Analysis of the Treatment Outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in Functional Dyspepsia: A Real-World Retrospective Study

B. Ravi Shankar, Sanjay Bandyopadhyay, Omesh Goyal
article en

Abstract

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastric neuromuscular disorder affecting approximately 20% of the global population, with significant economic implications, particularly in India, where prevalence rates vary between 7.6% and 49%. Characterized by epigastric pain, early satiety, and postprandial fullness, FD lacks identifiable anatomical abnormalities, complicating treatment. Prokinetic agents like Itopride and Acotiamide are commonly used, but face variability in treatment. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Itopride versus Acotiamide in managing FD symptoms in a real-world Indian context. Methods: This retrospective study analysed prospectively maintained data (from January to August 2024) across three sites in India. Seventy-nine patients (57 on Itopride and 22 on Acotiamide) were assessed for symptom improvement at 4 and 8-weeks post-treatment initiation, using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM). Symptom severity grades were compared between treatment groups using the Fischer exact or Chi-square test. Results: The mean age of FD patients was 45.59 years, with 46.8% male and demographic parameters were similar across both treatment groups. Itopride treatment significantly reduced symptom severity for epigastric pain, burning, early satiation, and postprandial fullness (p≤0.05) compared to the baseline, while Acotiamide showed non-significant improvements at both 4 and 8 weeks. Between treatment, comparison found fewer high symptom severity grades with Itopride than Acotiamide treatment (e.g. 1.75% vs. 13.64%, p=0.003, for epigastric pain, 8 weeks treatment). Also, after 8 weeks, 61.4% of Itopride patients reported symptom resolution, contrasted with 31.82% in the Acotiamide group. Adverse events were mild and infrequent in both groups, indicating comparable safety profiles. Conclusion: This study provides valuable real-world evidence supporting the use of Itopride as a preferred treatment option for FD in India. Further research is warranted to establish long-term efficacy and safety across diverse populations. Keywords: Functional Dyspepsia; Itopride; Acotiamide; Prokinetic Agents; Symptom Severity Grades

Exclusive Real World Evidence JournalVol. 4(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.