Quantifying the life cycle emissions of hybrid structures with advanced bio- and conventional materialization for low-embodied carbon urban densification of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

More than 20% of global carbon emissions are linked with the production of construction materials used in the built environment. The use of bio-materials along with urban densification strategies that avoid demolition and reduce material demand, have been recommended to achieve urban sustainability goals. Addressing these measures, this study compares the life cycle embodied carbon emissions of seven hybrid top-up structural systems composed of concrete, steel and advanced engineered timber products made out of softwood and hardwood species. The life cycle carbon emissions (expressed in kgCO 2 -eq) were estimated following a cradle-to-grave approach, with a functional unit equivalent to 1 m 2 of top-up structural system and focusing on The Netherlands and the city of Amsterdam as main geographical scope. A statistical analysis was included to account for the potential variation of emissions across each life cycle stage, using Monte Carlo simulations for random sampling. The results indicate that predominantly bio-based structures present a staggering 60% lower embodied carbon emissions compared with predominantly concrete, steel and modestly hybrid systems. Preserving the long-term carbon storage capacity of timber elements through high-quality reuse can offset 30–60% of the total positive emissions of the predominantly bio-based systems. Up to 6MtCO 2 -eq of the national carbon budget in The Netherlands can be saved from a radical uptake of bio-based structures in Amsterdam by 2050. Diversification of material diets with bio-based alternatives is recommended, along with established policy that can guarantee sustainable sourcing and prolonged lifespans through high-end reuse practices. • Bio-based structures present 60% lower embodied carbon emissions than conventional ones. • End-of-life stages contribute to more than 80% of emissions of bio-based structures. • Adequate E-o-L handling of timber elements can offset 60% of positive emissions. • A transition to timber structures in Amsterdam can save 6MtCO 2 -eq from national budget.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144273
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the life cycle emissions of hybrid structures with advanced bio- and conventional materialization for low-embodied carbon urban densification of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

G.J. Koskamp, Elizabeth M. Alejandre, Alexander Wandl, Arjan van Timmeren et al.
8 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.65
article

Quantifying the life cycle emissions of hybrid structures with advanced bio- and conventional materialization for low-embodied carbon urban densification of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

G.J. Koskamp, Elizabeth M. Alejandre, Alexander Wandl, Arjan van Timmeren, Mick van de Leur
article en
8 citations

Abstract

More than 20% of global carbon emissions are linked with the production of construction materials used in the built environment. The use of bio-materials along with urban densification strategies that avoid demolition and reduce material demand, have been recommended to achieve urban sustainability goals. Addressing these measures, this study compares the life cycle embodied carbon emissions of seven hybrid top-up structural systems composed of concrete, steel and advanced engineered timber products made out of softwood and hardwood species. The life cycle carbon emissions (expressed in kgCO 2 -eq) were estimated following a cradle-to-grave approach, with a functional unit equivalent to 1 m 2 of top-up structural system and focusing on The Netherlands and the city of Amsterdam as main geographical scope. A statistical analysis was included to account for the potential variation of emissions across each life cycle stage, using Monte Carlo simulations for random sampling. The results indicate that predominantly bio-based structures present a staggering 60% lower embodied carbon emissions compared with predominantly concrete, steel and modestly hybrid systems. Preserving the long-term carbon storage capacity of timber elements through high-quality reuse can offset 30–60% of the total positive emissions of the predominantly bio-based systems. Up to 6MtCO 2 -eq of the national carbon budget in The Netherlands can be saved from a radical uptake of bio-based structures in Amsterdam by 2050. Diversification of material diets with bio-based alternatives is recommended, along with established policy that can guarantee sustainable sourcing and prolonged lifespans through high-end reuse practices. • Bio-based structures present 60% lower embodied carbon emissions than conventional ones. • End-of-life stages contribute to more than 80% of emissions of bio-based structures. • Adequate E-o-L handling of timber elements can offset 60% of positive emissions. • A transition to timber structures in Amsterdam can save 6MtCO 2 -eq from national budget.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 483
Wageningen University & Research (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.