The US–China Rivalry: Health Diplomacy and Vaccine Donations Strategies

The COVID-19 pandemic has led China and the United States (US) to donate vaccines. This article explores how and why China and the US instrumentalise bilateral donations in their foreign policy strategies. While humanitarian concerns matter, political and economic interests push them to a more strategic reasoning. To test our hypotheses of humanitarian, geopolitical, and economic dimensions on bilateral donations, we employed ordinary least square and logit model regressions using a cross-sectional database with 214 countries containing data from various sources. The findings suggest that Washington has prioritised countries experiencing higher COVID-19 contamination rates and its trade import partners, while Beijing has focused on the poorest ones. Washington aided countries that historically disagreed with it in the United Nations General Assembly, while China has sent more vaccines to those politically aligned with Beijing. The US and China employ health diplomatic efforts to project power, and political dimensions are primarily considered when targeting countries to donate vaccines bilaterally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026241289153
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The US–China Rivalry: Health Diplomacy and Vaccine Donations Strategies

Rodolfo de Camargo Lima, Laerte Apolinário Júnior, Augusto Leal Rinaldi
2 citations
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
International Development and Aid
2.80
article

The US–China Rivalry: Health Diplomacy and Vaccine Donations Strategies

Rodolfo de Camargo Lima, Laerte Apolinário Júnior, Augusto Leal Rinaldi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led China and the United States (US) to donate vaccines. This article explores how and why China and the US instrumentalise bilateral donations in their foreign policy strategies. While humanitarian concerns matter, political and economic interests push them to a more strategic reasoning. To test our hypotheses of humanitarian, geopolitical, and economic dimensions on bilateral donations, we employed ordinary least square and logit model regressions using a cross-sectional database with 214 countries containing data from various sources. The findings suggest that Washington has prioritised countries experiencing higher COVID-19 contamination rates and its trade import partners, while Beijing has focused on the poorest ones. Washington aided countries that historically disagreed with it in the United Nations General Assembly, while China has sent more vaccines to those politically aligned with Beijing. The US and China employ health diplomatic efforts to project power, and political dimensions are primarily considered when targeting countries to donate vaccines bilaterally.

Journal of Current Chinese AffairsVol. 54(3)
San Sebastián University (CL), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Development and Aid
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.