Land Grab Double Binds: Peasant Farmers and/in the Ecuadorian Mining Boom

ABSTRACT The expansion of mining in Ecuador has stirred resistance among some Indigenous peasant communities in the name of territorial rights; others have offered their land and labour to mining companies. In this and similar land grab contexts, Indigenous peasant communities are often broadly represented as natural resisters or as corrupted collaborators, which, we argue, does not account for how peasants with territorial and/or land rights weigh their options. In Napo province, we examine how peasants have adjudicated contradictory socioeconomic pressures and, in turn, opted to work with miners. We highlight the methodological and political implications of centering how local ‘participants’ in land grabs experience untenable choices or ‘double binds’ to understand the efficacy of land grabs and the obstacles to resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agrarian Change
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12612
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land Grab Double Binds: Peasant Farmers and/in the Ecuadorian Mining Boom

Angus Lyall, Gabriela Ruales
1 citations
Journal of Agrarian Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
article

Land Grab Double Binds: Peasant Farmers and/in the Ecuadorian Mining Boom

Angus Lyall, Gabriela Ruales
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The expansion of mining in Ecuador has stirred resistance among some Indigenous peasant communities in the name of territorial rights; others have offered their land and labour to mining companies. In this and similar land grab contexts, Indigenous peasant communities are often broadly represented as natural resisters or as corrupted collaborators, which, we argue, does not account for how peasants with territorial and/or land rights weigh their options. In Napo province, we examine how peasants have adjudicated contradictory socioeconomic pressures and, in turn, opted to work with miners. We highlight the methodological and political implications of centering how local ‘participants’ in land grabs experience untenable choices or ‘double binds’ to understand the efficacy of land grabs and the obstacles to resistance.

Journal of Agrarian ChangeVol. 25(1)
Chapingo Autonomous University (MX), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.