Propose a practical plan for the identification of Safety‐Critical Equipment

Abstract The petrochemical and chemical industries are widely regarded as process industries with significant hazards. Investigations of numerous accidents have shown that over half are caused by equipment failures. Proper management of Safety‐Critical Equipment (SCE) related to major hazards and ensuring their functional integrity can significantly reduce the occurrence of Process Safety Management (PSM) accidents. There are currently many risk assessment technologies available to provide a foundational basis for SCE identification, although each method has its limitations. In 2016, the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) published guidelines for asset integrity (CCPS, 2017), outlining the process for determining SCE, offering a practical identification approach to the industry. However, the principles of this method are broad, and its practical implementation remains unclear. Therefore, this paper discusses how to integrate various risk assessment methods and develop a feasible procedure for SCE identification in practice. It highlights the need to link identified SCEs to corresponding safety‐critical tasks to ensure the functional integrity of the equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12659
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Propose a practical plan for the identification of Safety‐Critical Equipment

Chen‐Hua Wang, Rong‐Zan Lin, Yen‐Ju Lu
3 citations
Process Safety Progress
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.38
article

Propose a practical plan for the identification of Safety‐Critical Equipment

Chen‐Hua Wang, Rong‐Zan Lin, Yen‐Ju Lu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The petrochemical and chemical industries are widely regarded as process industries with significant hazards. Investigations of numerous accidents have shown that over half are caused by equipment failures. Proper management of Safety‐Critical Equipment (SCE) related to major hazards and ensuring their functional integrity can significantly reduce the occurrence of Process Safety Management (PSM) accidents. There are currently many risk assessment technologies available to provide a foundational basis for SCE identification, although each method has its limitations. In 2016, the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) published guidelines for asset integrity (CCPS, 2017), outlining the process for determining SCE, offering a practical identification approach to the industry. However, the principles of this method are broad, and its practical implementation remains unclear. Therefore, this paper discusses how to integrate various risk assessment methods and develop a feasible procedure for SCE identification in practice. It highlights the need to link identified SCEs to corresponding safety‐critical tasks to ensure the functional integrity of the equipment.

Process Safety ProgressVol. 44(1)
National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology (TW), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Propose a practical plan for the identification of Safety‐Critical Equipment — Chen‐Hua Wang, Rong‐Zan Lin, et al. · Process Safety Progress (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS