Tobacco industry narratives of e-cigarette use in the UK: a qualitative framing analysis
Public health actors have expressed concerns over the entry of the tobacco industry into the UK e-cigarette market. It is important to be aware of the tobacco industry's involvement and stated aims for e-cigarettes in the UK, given their historical attempts to divert attention from and escape responsibility for the harms caused by combustible cigarettes. The use of e-cigarettes amongst young people in the UK has remained constant, despite the law prohibiting sales to adolescents and claims by manufacturers and others that they are designed solely as a tool to quit smoking. This study sought to examine how tobacco-related organizations in the UK e-cigarette market frame the use of e-cigarettes. Publicly available materials between September 2015 and June 2023 were collected from four transnational tobacco companies which have invested in the e-cigarette category, and from a UK e-cigarette trade association. A qualitative framing analysis of materials was conducted guided by relevant frameworks from the Commercial Determinants of Health literature. The analysis identified seven framings used by tobacco-related organizations relevant to e-cigarette usage in the UK. These were: co-opting of harm reduction; consumer choice; following the 'evidence'; insufficient evidence; the right kind of regulation; 'us' and 'them' rhetoric and marketing and advertising. By highlighting tobacco-related organizations' e-cigarette framings and contradictions, this study raises awareness of the rhetorical strategies used by the industry which aim to relegitimize tobacco companies in the political and public spheres.
Authors
- May CI van Schalkwyk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-2289)
- Mark Petticrew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-5517)
- Benjamin Hawkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8046)
- Rose Burns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-2403)
- Ellie Harrison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7515-4129)
Institutions
- University of London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Promotion International
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae161
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.70
Funders
- Health and Care Research Wales
- UK Research and Innovation
- Cancer Research UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- British Heart Foundation
- Public Health Agency
- Medical Research Council
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Natural Environment Research Council