Rehabilitation and care after hip fracture: a cost-utility analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
The intervention demonstrated a slight improvement in effectiveness over the control but was costly. For patients not requiring respite care, the intervention effect was slightly higher, and the cost differences statistically insignificant. In total 91% received informal care and the economic contribution of informal care exceeded the municipal home care services.
Authors
- Jonas Ammundsen Ipsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-0531)
- Eva Draborg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-7243)
- Jan Abel Olsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-2669)
- Inge Hansen Bruun
- Bjarke Viberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-4282)
- Lars Tobiesen Pedersen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-9307)
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University College South Denmark (DK)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Lillebaelt Hospital (DK)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40897
- Primary Topic
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Danske Fysioterapeuter
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
- Sygehus Lillebælt