Correction to “Fatigue Crack Characteristics in Gradient Predeformed Pearlitic Steel under Multiaxial Loading”

In Figure A3 the top left subfigure should be replaced as it is a duplicate of the center top subfigure.In the below figure, the top left subfigure of Figure A3 is replaced.We would also like to make an adjustment to the text in section 3.4 Crack Path to better match the new image.In the first paragraph under section 3.4 Crack Path, the text should read:The difference in crack path between the undeformed material PD0 and PD1 is small.Both show an inclined crack growth, but the crack propagates at a slightly shallower angle for PD1.However, as the degree of predeformation increases to PD3, a marked difference is observed.The crack now propagates closer to the direction of the microstructure alignment resulting from the predeformation, leading to a transverse fracture.For both duplicate PD3 test bars and one of the PD1 test bars, the final fatigue crack length prior to fracture is much shorter compared to the other cases.This indicates that at certain combinations of predeformation, crack geometry, and loading, the effective critical stress intensity is reached at shorter crack lengths.We apologize for this error.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402410
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to “Fatigue Crack Characteristics in Gradient Predeformed Pearlitic Steel under Multiaxial Loading”

Magnus Ekh, Johan Ahlström, Daniel Gren
1 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
0.27
article

Correction to “Fatigue Crack Characteristics in Gradient Predeformed Pearlitic Steel under Multiaxial Loading”

Magnus Ekh, Johan Ahlström, Daniel Gren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In Figure A3 the top left subfigure should be replaced as it is a duplicate of the center top subfigure.In the below figure, the top left subfigure of Figure A3 is replaced.We would also like to make an adjustment to the text in section 3.4 Crack Path to better match the new image.In the first paragraph under section 3.4 Crack Path, the text should read:The difference in crack path between the undeformed material PD0 and PD1 is small.Both show an inclined crack growth, but the crack propagates at a slightly shallower angle for PD1.However, as the degree of predeformation increases to PD3, a marked difference is observed.The crack now propagates closer to the direction of the microstructure alignment resulting from the predeformation, leading to a transverse fracture.For both duplicate PD3 test bars and one of the PD1 test bars, the final fatigue crack length prior to fracture is much shorter compared to the other cases.This indicates that at certain combinations of predeformation, crack geometry, and loading, the effective critical stress intensity is reached at shorter crack lengths.We apologize for this error.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 26(24)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.