Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-Clock Models: Distinguishing between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates

In Bayesian molecular-clock dating of species divergences, rate models are used to construct the prior on the molecular evolutionary rates for branches in the phylogeny, with independent and autocorrelated rate models being commonly used. The two classes of models, however, can result in markedly different divergence time estimates for the same data set, and thus selecting the best rate model appears important for obtaining reliable inferences of divergence times. However, the properties of Bayesian rate model selection are not well understood, in particular when the number of sequence partitions analyzed increases and when age calibrations (such as fossil calibrations) are misspecified. Furthermore, Bayesian rate model selection is computationally expensive as it requires the calculation of marginal likelihoods by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling, and therefore, methods that can speed up the model selection procedure without compromising its accuracy are desirable. In this study, we use a combination of computer simulations and real data analysis to investigate the statistical behavior of Bayesian rate model selection and we also explore approximations of the likelihood to improve computational efficiency in large phylogenomic data sets. Our simulations demonstrate that the posterior probability for the correct rate model converges to one as more molecular sequence partitions are analyzed and when no calibrations are used, as expected due to asymptotic Bayesian model selection theory. Furthermore, we also show the model selection procedure is robust to slight misspecification of calibrations, and reliable inference of the correct rate model is possible in this case. However, we show that when calibrations are seriously misspecified, calculated model probabilities are completely wrong and may converge to one for the wrong rate model. Finally, we demonstrate that approximating the phylogenetic likelihood under an arcsine branch-length transform can dramatically reduce the computational cost of rate model selection without compromising accuracy. We test the approximate procedure on two large phylogenies of primates (372 species) and flowering plants (644 species), replicating results obtained on smaller data sets using exact likelihood. Our findings and methodology can assist users in selecting the optimal rate model for estimating times and rates along the Tree of Life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae066
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-Clock Models: Distinguishing between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates

Mario dos Reis, Lucas Freitas, Muthukumaran Panchaksaram
2 citations
Systematic Biology
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
3.18
article

Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-Clock Models: Distinguishing between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates

Mario dos Reis, Lucas Freitas, Muthukumaran Panchaksaram
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In Bayesian molecular-clock dating of species divergences, rate models are used to construct the prior on the molecular evolutionary rates for branches in the phylogeny, with independent and autocorrelated rate models being commonly used. The two classes of models, however, can result in markedly different divergence time estimates for the same data set, and thus selecting the best rate model appears important for obtaining reliable inferences of divergence times. However, the properties of Bayesian rate model selection are not well understood, in particular when the number of sequence partitions analyzed increases and when age calibrations (such as fossil calibrations) are misspecified. Furthermore, Bayesian rate model selection is computationally expensive as it requires the calculation of marginal likelihoods by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling, and therefore, methods that can speed up the model selection procedure without compromising its accuracy are desirable. In this study, we use a combination of computer simulations and real data analysis to investigate the statistical behavior of Bayesian rate model selection and we also explore approximations of the likelihood to improve computational efficiency in large phylogenomic data sets. Our simulations demonstrate that the posterior probability for the correct rate model converges to one as more molecular sequence partitions are analyzed and when no calibrations are used, as expected due to asymptotic Bayesian model selection theory. Furthermore, we also show the model selection procedure is robust to slight misspecification of calibrations, and reliable inference of the correct rate model is possible in this case. However, we show that when calibrations are seriously misspecified, calculated model probabilities are completely wrong and may converge to one for the wrong rate model. Finally, we demonstrate that approximating the phylogenetic likelihood under an arcsine branch-length transform can dramatically reduce the computational cost of rate model selection without compromising accuracy. We test the approximate procedure on two large phylogenies of primates (372 species) and flowering plants (644 species), replicating results obtained on smaller data sets using exact likelihood. Our findings and methodology can assist users in selecting the optimal rate model for estimating times and rates along the Tree of Life.

Systematic BiologyVol. 74(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
3.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.