The Nature of the Right to Personal Data: A Civil Law Perspective

In today’s context of growing volumes of personal data and the increasing number of legally significant actions that can be conducted with access to such data, the importance of legal protection for personal data has become more pronounced. This paper aims to examine the nature of the right to personal data. Based on an analysis of Russian legislation, the Author concludes that there exists an unnamed, independent subjective right, which serves to enable the data subject to control and define the conditions for data processing, as well as to protect personal data from unauthorized use. The study critically evaluates the current scientific debate regarding the nature of this right. Three primary approaches in the academic discourse on the autonomy of this right are identified, tentatively categorized as the “ignoring”, “denying”, and “recognizing” approaches. The Author notes the lack of a uniform scientific approach to naming this right and suggests designating it as “the right to the inviolability of personal data”. This right is characterized as an independent, subjective, personal non-property, and absolute civil right. The paper further explores the conditions under which this right arises and terminates. Specifically, it originates at the birth of an individual and terminates when the purpose of personal data processing ceases, typically upon the death of the individual whose data was processed. The need for legal succession is justified to allow heirs to ensure the inviolability of the testator’s personal data if its processing continues posthumously. In distinguishing between the right to the inviolability of personal data and the right to privacy, the Author argues that these are distinct subjective rights. They are interconnected only in theoretical frameworks that enable the use of protective measures for one right when the other is infringed. A trend in judicial practice has been identified, where courts recognize the existence of a right to personal data. Although not explicitly named, this right is nonetheless afforded legal protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Siberian Law Review
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-4-579-595
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nature of the Right to Personal Data: A Civil Law Perspective

L. SHVETS
Siberian Law Review
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

The Nature of the Right to Personal Data: A Civil Law Perspective

L. SHVETS
article en

Abstract

In today’s context of growing volumes of personal data and the increasing number of legally significant actions that can be conducted with access to such data, the importance of legal protection for personal data has become more pronounced. This paper aims to examine the nature of the right to personal data. Based on an analysis of Russian legislation, the Author concludes that there exists an unnamed, independent subjective right, which serves to enable the data subject to control and define the conditions for data processing, as well as to protect personal data from unauthorized use. The study critically evaluates the current scientific debate regarding the nature of this right. Three primary approaches in the academic discourse on the autonomy of this right are identified, tentatively categorized as the “ignoring”, “denying”, and “recognizing” approaches. The Author notes the lack of a uniform scientific approach to naming this right and suggests designating it as “the right to the inviolability of personal data”. This right is characterized as an independent, subjective, personal non-property, and absolute civil right. The paper further explores the conditions under which this right arises and terminates. Specifically, it originates at the birth of an individual and terminates when the purpose of personal data processing ceases, typically upon the death of the individual whose data was processed. The need for legal succession is justified to allow heirs to ensure the inviolability of the testator’s personal data if its processing continues posthumously. In distinguishing between the right to the inviolability of personal data and the right to privacy, the Author argues that these are distinct subjective rights. They are interconnected only in theoretical frameworks that enable the use of protective measures for one right when the other is infringed. A trend in judicial practice has been identified, where courts recognize the existence of a right to personal data. Although not explicitly named, this right is nonetheless afforded legal protection.

Siberian Law ReviewVol. 21(4)
National Research Tomsk State University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.