Comparison of 1<i>g</i> and centrifuge modelling of drag anchors with subsurface wireless tracking

The kinematic behaviour of drag embedment anchors has become a recent research focus due to the increase in offshore renewable energy devices. This is due to their potential use as an anchoring system for future floating wind applications, in addition to the need to understand their penetration behaviour as a part of the Cable Burial Risk Assessment. Studies on the behaviour of anchors typically consist of field scale or model centrifuge tests, where such facilities are not readily available to all and can result in significant cost. In addition to this, measuring the load–penetration behaviour of an anchor has proven to be a significant challenge, as any contact-based methods are likely to influence the penetration behaviour of the anchor. In this paper, a novel wireless method of recording the inclination of the anchor and calculating the penetration depth is presented. A comparison of the penetration behaviour of a Class F (AC-14) anchor has been made in sand using centrifuge and 1g model scale testing. The results indicate that the 1g testing can match the behaviour of the anchor testing in the centrifuge in terms of both the position of the anchor and its orientation during the dragging event.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.24.00029
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 1g and centrifuge modelling of drag anchors with subsurface wireless tracking

Yaseen Sharif, William M. Coombs, Kirstin Johnson, Gareth Carter et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.52
article

Comparison of 1g and centrifuge modelling of drag anchors with subsurface wireless tracking

Yaseen Sharif, William M. Coombs, Kirstin Johnson, Gareth Carter, Robert E. Bird, Michael Brown, Charles Augarde, Craig Davidson, Jonathan Knappett, Catriona Macdonald
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The kinematic behaviour of drag embedment anchors has become a recent research focus due to the increase in offshore renewable energy devices. This is due to their potential use as an anchoring system for future floating wind applications, in addition to the need to understand their penetration behaviour as a part of the Cable Burial Risk Assessment. Studies on the behaviour of anchors typically consist of field scale or model centrifuge tests, where such facilities are not readily available to all and can result in significant cost. In addition to this, measuring the load–penetration behaviour of an anchor has proven to be a significant challenge, as any contact-based methods are likely to influence the penetration behaviour of the anchor. In this paper, a novel wireless method of recording the inclination of the anchor and calculating the penetration depth is presented. A comparison of the penetration behaviour of a Class F (AC-14) anchor has been made in sand using centrifuge and 1g model scale testing. The results indicate that the 1g testing can match the behaviour of the anchor testing in the centrifuge in terms of both the position of the anchor and its orientation during the dragging event.

International Journal of Physical Modelling in GeotechnicsVol. 25(2)
British Geological Survey (GB), University of Dundee (GB), Durham University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Sight Research UK, Durham University, British Geological Survey, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.