The Use of Smart Rings in Health Monitoring—A Meta-Analysis

Smart Rings (SRs) are user-friendly devices capable of measuring various health parameters, making them suitable for remote continuous monitoring in diverse clinical settings. Since the available evidence on the accuracy of SRs recording health data is highly heterogeneous, this systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searched for articles evaluating the efficacy of SRs for sleep, respiratory, and cardiovascular monitoring across the PubMed, SCOPUS, and ProQuest databases. Meta-analyses were conducted for health outcomes evaluated in at least three studies with a comparable study population and design, and the same comparison device. Nineteen articles were included: eleven analyses focused on sleep quality, eight on cardiovascular parameters, and one on oxygen saturation. Studies analysing cardiovascular outcomes found a good accuracy of SRs in measuring heart rate (HR) with a mean bias of −0.4 bpms (limits of agreement (LoAs): −2.7; 1.8). The meta-analyses showed variability in SRs’ efficacy in monitoring total sleep time (mean bias: −21.3 min, LoAs: −69.9, 27.4) and REM duration (mean bias: −18.2 min, LoAs: −33.3, −3.1). The results highlighted the promising potential of SRs for HR monitoring. Further research is needed to clarify the reliability of SRs in monitoring sleep quality and their use directed to a broader range of health parameters. With further development, SRs could become valuable tools for healthcare professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310778
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Smart Rings in Health Monitoring—A Meta-Analysis

Jacopo Lenzi, Alice Conni, Francesco Sanmarchi, Matteo Fiore et al.
16 citations
Applied Sciences
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.95
article

The Use of Smart Rings in Health Monitoring—A Meta-Analysis

Jacopo Lenzi, Alice Conni, Francesco Sanmarchi, Matteo Fiore, Alessandro Bianconi, Gaia Sicari, Davide Golinelli, Giulia Tomaiuolo, Francesco Zito
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Smart Rings (SRs) are user-friendly devices capable of measuring various health parameters, making them suitable for remote continuous monitoring in diverse clinical settings. Since the available evidence on the accuracy of SRs recording health data is highly heterogeneous, this systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searched for articles evaluating the efficacy of SRs for sleep, respiratory, and cardiovascular monitoring across the PubMed, SCOPUS, and ProQuest databases. Meta-analyses were conducted for health outcomes evaluated in at least three studies with a comparable study population and design, and the same comparison device. Nineteen articles were included: eleven analyses focused on sleep quality, eight on cardiovascular parameters, and one on oxygen saturation. Studies analysing cardiovascular outcomes found a good accuracy of SRs in measuring heart rate (HR) with a mean bias of −0.4 bpms (limits of agreement (LoAs): −2.7; 1.8). The meta-analyses showed variability in SRs’ efficacy in monitoring total sleep time (mean bias: −21.3 min, LoAs: −69.9, 27.4) and REM duration (mean bias: −18.2 min, LoAs: −33.3, −3.1). The results highlighted the promising potential of SRs for HR monitoring. Further research is needed to clarify the reliability of SRs in monitoring sleep quality and their use directed to a broader range of health parameters. With further development, SRs could become valuable tools for healthcare professionals.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(23)
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.