A Challenge to the Spirit of Public Administration: Social Equity Reconsidered in Light of <i>Students for Fair Admissions</i>

Social equity has been considered a pillar that supports the legitimacy of the field of public administration, with affirmative action as one of the most visible vehicles of the principle. However, the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions calls for a reconsideration of the practice and the value it supports. Though the Court has long viewed affirmative action to be suspect, it has now declared that the practice undermines the Constitution's mandate for equal treatment. This decision confronts not only what university administrators have done in the past, it also raises concerns about the field's broader relationship to the value of social equity more generally. The Court's opinion is a call to the field to recognize that public action which rests on social equity must be in alignment with a stiffened strict scrutiny in order to meet constitutional standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Review of Public Administration
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241300512
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Challenge to the Spirit of Public Administration: Social Equity Reconsidered in Light of Students for Fair Admissions

Chad B. Newswander
The American Review of Public Administration
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

A Challenge to the Spirit of Public Administration: Social Equity Reconsidered in Light of Students for Fair Admissions

Chad B. Newswander
article en

Abstract

Social equity has been considered a pillar that supports the legitimacy of the field of public administration, with affirmative action as one of the most visible vehicles of the principle. However, the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions calls for a reconsideration of the practice and the value it supports. Though the Court has long viewed affirmative action to be suspect, it has now declared that the practice undermines the Constitution's mandate for equal treatment. This decision confronts not only what university administrators have done in the past, it also raises concerns about the field's broader relationship to the value of social equity more generally. The Court's opinion is a call to the field to recognize that public action which rests on social equity must be in alignment with a stiffened strict scrutiny in order to meet constitutional standards.

The American Review of Public AdministrationVol. 55(2)
Brigham Young University - Idaho (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Challenge to the Spirit of Public Administration: Social Equity Reconsidered in Light of <i>Students for Fair Admissions</i> — Chad B. Newswander · The American Review of Public Administration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS