Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS

<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage-conventional or high-definition (HD)-to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient's safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121162
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS

Shen‐Hsing Annabel Chen, Talakad N. Sathyaprabha, Rajan Kashyap, Vanteemar Sathyanarayana Sreeraj et al.
5 citations
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
1.24
article

Personalized Dose Selection for Treatment of Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using tDCS

Shen‐Hsing Annabel Chen, Talakad N. Sathyaprabha, Rajan Kashyap, Vanteemar Sathyanarayana Sreeraj, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Kaviraja Udupa, Sagarika Bhattacharjee, John E. Desmond, P.Sivakumar P.Sivakumar
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Individualizing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters can improve precision in neuropsychiatric disorders. One important decision for the clinician is the selection of an appropriate montage-conventional or high-definition (HD)-to implement dose-controlled tDCS while maintaining the patient's safety. <b>Method</b>: The present study simulated tDCS administration using T1-weighted brain images of 50 dementia, 25 depression patients, and 25 healthy individuals for two conventional and HD montages, targeting the regions of interest (ROIs) in the dorsal and ventral pathways that support language processing. For each tDCS configuration, the electric fields at the ROIs and the individualized dose required to achieve the desired current intensity at the target ROI across the subjects were estimated. Linear regression was performed on these parameters. <b>Result</b>: A significant relationship between atrophy and current dose that varies according to the disease was found. The dementia patients with significant brain atrophy required a higher personalized dosage for HD montage, as the current intensity at the target ROIs was lower and more variable than that of conventional montage. For dementia, tDCS individualization is pathway-dependent, wherein HD configuration of the dorsal route requires current dosages above the safety limit (>4 mA) for 46% of individuals. However, there was no significant difference in electrode configurations between the HD and traditional setups for depression and healthy volunteers without significant brain atrophy. <b>Conclusions</b>: HD-tDCS with fixed locations is limited, making conventional tDCS more effective for dose-controlled applications. In patients with atrophy, individualized adjustments based on simulations are needed due to the variable stimulation strength in the ROI.

Brain SciencesVol. 14(12)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.