Stigma Management within and between Levels

Abstract We respond to recent calls to connect our understanding of stigma across and between levels of analysis by investigating how stigma management strategies to the same stigma vary and relate in nested industry, organizational, and individual actors. Drawing on data collected from 61 interviews with various workers in the coal industry in Australia, we find evidence of commonalities across individual, organizational, and industry stigma management strategies as well as substantial distinctions. Furthermore, we find evidence of cross‐level influence efforts that aim to increase the probability that specific tactics will be more likely adopted or effective. While individual, organizational, and industry actors can all be ‘labelled’ by the same stigmatization, the present study is, to our knowledge, the first that explores whether and how actors at different levels manage the same stigma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13168
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigma Management within and between Levels

Rebecca Mitchell, Jane Maley, Brendan Boyle, Jun Gu
4 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Employment and Welfare Studies
3.40
article

Stigma Management within and between Levels

Rebecca Mitchell, Jane Maley, Brendan Boyle, Jun Gu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We respond to recent calls to connect our understanding of stigma across and between levels of analysis by investigating how stigma management strategies to the same stigma vary and relate in nested industry, organizational, and individual actors. Drawing on data collected from 61 interviews with various workers in the coal industry in Australia, we find evidence of commonalities across individual, organizational, and industry stigma management strategies as well as substantial distinctions. Furthermore, we find evidence of cross‐level influence efforts that aim to increase the probability that specific tactics will be more likely adopted or effective. While individual, organizational, and industry actors can all be ‘labelled’ by the same stigmatization, the present study is, to our knowledge, the first that explores whether and how actors at different levels manage the same stigma.

Journal of Management Studies
Sabancı Üniversitesi (TR), Macquarie University (AU)
Australian Coal Industry’s Research Program, Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Employment and Welfare Studies
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.