Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Glycated albumin (GA) serves as a biomarker for short-term glycemic control (2-3 weeks), playing a role in diabetes management. Our goal was to establish reference intervals (RIs) for serum GA, and the ratios of 1,5-anhydroglucitol to GA (AGI) and GA to HbA1c in a Euro-Brazilian pediatric population (10 y, n = 299), adults (43.5 y; n = 290), and pregnant women (26 y, n = 406; 26.5 ± 3.1 gestation weeks). <b>Methods:</b> Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to determine RIs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children (n = 148) and adults (n = 81), type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 283), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n = 177). <b>Results:</b> Both non-pregnant and pregnant women exhibited GA RIs of 10.0-13.3% and 10.6-14.7%, respectively. The AGI ratio varied from 1.2-4.3 in children, 0.9-3.6 in adults, and 0.8-3.1 in pregnant women. Meanwhile, the GA/HbA1c ratio ranged from 1.8-2.6 in children and adults to 2.3-3.6 in pregnant women. GA and AGI ratios accurately differentiated between T1D and T2D, demonstrating high sensitivity (>84%) and specificity (>97%), with AGI showing superior performance (AUC > 0.99). The GA/HbA1c ratio exhibited moderate discriminatory power (AUC > 0.733) but was less effective in distinguishing adult-onset T1D and T2D, suggesting its limited utility in certain groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The proposed RIs are consistent with those of other Caucasian populations, affirming their relevance for Euro-Brazilian patients. The GA and AGI ratios emerge as valuable diagnostic tools for T1D and T2D, though their reduced sensitivity in diagnosing GDM warrants further investigation. Clinicians might leverage GA and AGI ratios for more tailored diabetes management, especially when HbA1c results are not optimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122651
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Vivian Rotuno Moure, Fabiane Gomes de Moraes Rego, Liana Signorini, Marciane Welter et al.
3 citations
Biomedicines
Diabetes Management and Research
1.07
article

Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Vivian Rotuno Moure, Fabiane Gomes de Moraes Rego, Liana Signorini, Marciane Welter, Waldemar Volanski, Alexessander Couto Alves, Yusra Al-Lahham, Geraldo Picheth, Gláucio Valdameri, Marcel Henrique Marcondes Sari, Ademir Luiz do Prado
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Glycated albumin (GA) serves as a biomarker for short-term glycemic control (2-3 weeks), playing a role in diabetes management. Our goal was to establish reference intervals (RIs) for serum GA, and the ratios of 1,5-anhydroglucitol to GA (AGI) and GA to HbA1c in a Euro-Brazilian pediatric population (10 y, n = 299), adults (43.5 y; n = 290), and pregnant women (26 y, n = 406; 26.5 ± 3.1 gestation weeks). <b>Methods:</b> Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to determine RIs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children (n = 148) and adults (n = 81), type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 283), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n = 177). <b>Results:</b> Both non-pregnant and pregnant women exhibited GA RIs of 10.0-13.3% and 10.6-14.7%, respectively. The AGI ratio varied from 1.2-4.3 in children, 0.9-3.6 in adults, and 0.8-3.1 in pregnant women. Meanwhile, the GA/HbA1c ratio ranged from 1.8-2.6 in children and adults to 2.3-3.6 in pregnant women. GA and AGI ratios accurately differentiated between T1D and T2D, demonstrating high sensitivity (>84%) and specificity (>97%), with AGI showing superior performance (AUC > 0.99). The GA/HbA1c ratio exhibited moderate discriminatory power (AUC > 0.733) but was less effective in distinguishing adult-onset T1D and T2D, suggesting its limited utility in certain groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The proposed RIs are consistent with those of other Caucasian populations, affirming their relevance for Euro-Brazilian patients. The GA and AGI ratios emerge as valuable diagnostic tools for T1D and T2D, though their reduced sensitivity in diagnosing GDM warrants further investigation. Clinicians might leverage GA and AGI ratios for more tailored diabetes management, especially when HbA1c results are not optimal.

BiomedicinesVol. 12(12)
Instituto Federal do Paraná (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará (BR), Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba (BR), University of Southampton (GB), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Diabetes Management and Research
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.