Long-term outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following in-hospital cardiac arrest: Analysis of EXCEL registry data

One in three patients who received ECPR following IHCA were alive at six months and most had a good functional outcome. However, survivors reported higher levels of disability and a worse health status at six months compared with the baseline and ongoing complications were common.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.08.008
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following in-hospital cardiac arrest: Analysis of EXCEL registry data

Daryl Jones, Carol Hodgson, Eldho Paul, Glenn M. Eastwood et al.
5 citations
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.92
article

Long-term outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following in-hospital cardiac arrest: Analysis of EXCEL registry data

Daryl Jones, Carol Hodgson, Eldho Paul, Glenn M. Eastwood, Gemma Pound, Ary Serpa Neto
article en
5 citations

Abstract

One in three patients who received ECPR following IHCA were alive at six months and most had a good functional outcome. However, survivors reported higher levels of disability and a worse health status at six months compared with the baseline and ongoing complications were common.

Critical Care and ResuscitationVol. 26(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Austin Hospital (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Monash University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.