The Growth and Stagnation of US Life Expectancy: A Dynamic Simulation Model and Implications

US life expectancy now lags significantly behind the majority of high-income countries, having grown more slowly since 1980 for reasons that are not evident and have been debated. An exploratory system dynamics model is presented that reproduces the full pattern of US life expectancy from 1960 to the present. Multiple socioeconomic and behavioral factors help to explain the historical pattern, two of them apparently most responsible for the stagnation since 1980: the growth of obesity and the leveling off of growth in social spending. Some of the factors in the model are traced back to earlier causes, and obesity’s growth in particular is traced back to excess growth in private health care spending and its adverse effect on workers’ wages. The model’s base run does a good job of reproducing a variety of historical time series data going back to the 1960s, and counterfactual tests produce plausible results and clarify the model’s main themes. The model may thus be considered a reasonable starting point for more conclusive future modeling of US life expectancy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120510
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Growth and Stagnation of US Life Expectancy: A Dynamic Simulation Model and Implications

Jack Homer
Systems
Global Health Care Issues
article

The Growth and Stagnation of US Life Expectancy: A Dynamic Simulation Model and Implications

Jack Homer
article en

Abstract

US life expectancy now lags significantly behind the majority of high-income countries, having grown more slowly since 1980 for reasons that are not evident and have been debated. An exploratory system dynamics model is presented that reproduces the full pattern of US life expectancy from 1960 to the present. Multiple socioeconomic and behavioral factors help to explain the historical pattern, two of them apparently most responsible for the stagnation since 1980: the growth of obesity and the leveling off of growth in social spending. Some of the factors in the model are traced back to earlier causes, and obesity’s growth in particular is traced back to excess growth in private health care spending and its adverse effect on workers’ wages. The model’s base run does a good job of reproducing a variety of historical time series data going back to the 1960s, and counterfactual tests produce plausible results and clarify the model’s main themes. The model may thus be considered a reasonable starting point for more conclusive future modeling of US life expectancy.

SystemsVol. 12(12)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Growth and Stagnation of US Life Expectancy: A Dynamic Simulation Model and Implications — Jack Homer · Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS