How the Russian–Ukrainian war reshapes the climate policy context

Abstract The Russian military aggression against Ukraine has had significant global impacts on energy security, economy and geopolitics. The 2022 global energy crisis raises questions about how the war affects the energy transition and global climate policy. However, there are limited studies that incorporate its effects into self-consistent projections of alternative scenarios. This scenario study uses two leading macro-economic models and one integrated assessment model to assess how the war in Ukraine and its direct implications—trade restrictions and rising energy prices—affect economies, energy supply and demand trends, emissions and the feasibility of climate policies. The models consistently project that the disruptive responses to the war lead to a shift from fossil fuels (notably natural gas) to renewable energy and a consequent CO 2 emission reduction of about 1%–5%, in the period up to 2050, both for the European Union and globally. However, projections differ across models in terms of sectoral and regional contributions to emission reductions. The results are found to be highly sensitive to the expected, yet uncertain persistence of higher fossil energy prices due to the war, which depends on the duration of the conflict, the disruption of global energy supplies and the response of other major fossil fuel exporters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad9490
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the Russian–Ukrainian war reshapes the climate policy context

Ha Thi Thu Bui, Panagiotis Fragkos, Michel den Elzen, Áron Dénes Hartvig et al.
7 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
4.97
article

How the Russian–Ukrainian war reshapes the climate policy context

Ha Thi Thu Bui, Panagiotis Fragkos, Michel den Elzen, Áron Dénes Hartvig, Ioannis Dafnomilis, Dimitris Fragkiadakis, Mathijs J. H. M. Harmsen, Harmen Sytze de Boer, Detlef Peter van Vuuren, An T. Vu, Elena Hooijschuur, Dora Fazekas
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Russian military aggression against Ukraine has had significant global impacts on energy security, economy and geopolitics. The 2022 global energy crisis raises questions about how the war affects the energy transition and global climate policy. However, there are limited studies that incorporate its effects into self-consistent projections of alternative scenarios. This scenario study uses two leading macro-economic models and one integrated assessment model to assess how the war in Ukraine and its direct implications—trade restrictions and rising energy prices—affect economies, energy supply and demand trends, emissions and the feasibility of climate policies. The models consistently project that the disruptive responses to the war lead to a shift from fossil fuels (notably natural gas) to renewable energy and a consequent CO 2 emission reduction of about 1%–5%, in the period up to 2050, both for the European Union and globally. However, projections differ across models in terms of sectoral and regional contributions to emission reductions. The results are found to be highly sensitive to the expected, yet uncertain persistence of higher fossil energy prices due to the war, which depends on the duration of the conflict, the disruption of global energy supplies and the response of other major fossil fuel exporters.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(12)
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Utrecht University (NL), Cosmote (Greece) (GR), Institute for Sustainable Development (SI), Cambridge Econometrics (United Kingdom) (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.