From Polylithic to Monolithic: The Design of a Lightweight, Stiffened, Non-Rotational, Deep-Drawn Automotive Product

The transition from polylithic (composed of many parts) to monolithic (one part) design in automotive components presents an opportunity for a reduction in part count, weight, processing routes, and production time without compromising performance. The traditional design approaches for rooftop tents assemble various sheet metal and extrusions together using different joining processes such as welding, adhesive bonding, bolting, and riveting. This is often associated with disadvantages, such as increased weight, high production time, and leaking joints. This research, therefore, presents the development of a monolithic, lightweight, stiffened, non-rotational automotive rooftop tent that is manufactured via the deep-drawing process. An onsite company case study was conducted to analyze the polylithic product and its production process to determine its limitations. This was followed by the design of a lightweight, non-rotational monolithic product whose purpose is to eliminate the identified disadvantages. The stiffness geometries were developed to enhance the overall structural integrity without adding unnecessary weight. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to analyze and evaluate alternative layouts against criteria such as complexity, tool design, symmetry, rigidity, and cost. Simulations conducted using NX 2024 software confirmed the effectiveness of this design. The results show that the monolithic rooftop tent has a comparable stiffness performance between the lightweight, monolithic rooftop tent and the heavy, polylithic rooftop tent. At the same time, the part count was reduced from twenty-three (23) single parts (polylithic) to a one (1) part (monolithic) rooftop tent, the weight was reduced by 15.6 kg, which translates to a 30% weight reduction without compromising the performance, processing routes were reduced from eight (8) to three (3), production time was reduced by 120 min, and leaking was eliminated. It can, therefore, be concluded that the design and manufacturing of monolithic rooftop tents leads to a lighter and stronger product.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Designs
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8060123
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Polylithic to Monolithic: The Design of a Lightweight, Stiffened, Non-Rotational, Deep-Drawn Automotive Product

Andreas Sterzing, Stephen Matope, Matthias Nagel, Gibson P. Chirinda
3 citations
Designs
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.05
article

From Polylithic to Monolithic: The Design of a Lightweight, Stiffened, Non-Rotational, Deep-Drawn Automotive Product

Andreas Sterzing, Stephen Matope, Matthias Nagel, Gibson P. Chirinda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The transition from polylithic (composed of many parts) to monolithic (one part) design in automotive components presents an opportunity for a reduction in part count, weight, processing routes, and production time without compromising performance. The traditional design approaches for rooftop tents assemble various sheet metal and extrusions together using different joining processes such as welding, adhesive bonding, bolting, and riveting. This is often associated with disadvantages, such as increased weight, high production time, and leaking joints. This research, therefore, presents the development of a monolithic, lightweight, stiffened, non-rotational automotive rooftop tent that is manufactured via the deep-drawing process. An onsite company case study was conducted to analyze the polylithic product and its production process to determine its limitations. This was followed by the design of a lightweight, non-rotational monolithic product whose purpose is to eliminate the identified disadvantages. The stiffness geometries were developed to enhance the overall structural integrity without adding unnecessary weight. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to analyze and evaluate alternative layouts against criteria such as complexity, tool design, symmetry, rigidity, and cost. Simulations conducted using NX 2024 software confirmed the effectiveness of this design. The results show that the monolithic rooftop tent has a comparable stiffness performance between the lightweight, monolithic rooftop tent and the heavy, polylithic rooftop tent. At the same time, the part count was reduced from twenty-three (23) single parts (polylithic) to a one (1) part (monolithic) rooftop tent, the weight was reduced by 15.6 kg, which translates to a 30% weight reduction without compromising the performance, processing routes were reduced from eight (8) to three (3), production time was reduced by 120 min, and leaking was eliminated. It can, therefore, be concluded that the design and manufacturing of monolithic rooftop tents leads to a lighter and stronger product.

DesignsVol. 8(6)
Stellenbosch University (ZA), Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.