Ocena programowa kierunku studiów o profilu ogólnoakademickim – krytyczne refleksje na temat regulacji prawnej i praktyki jej stosowania

The study addresses the issue of the program evaluation of general academic studies carried out by the Polish Accreditation Committee. The analysis of the legal regulation and practice of program evaluation indicated that doubts and reservations concern both fundamental issues and specific solutions. The expression of the criteria for the program evaluation of general academic studies in an internal act – the Statute of the Polish Accreditation Committee – was considered controversial. According to the authors, the model of the self-assessment report is overly elaborate. They assessed as deficient the criteria for the selection of experts, as well as the lack of sufficiently precise regulation of the scope of their authority during programme evaluation. In conclusion, they suggested some amendments to the current legislation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31268/zpbas.2024.04
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Rights and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ocena programowa kierunku studiów o profilu ogólnoakademickim – krytyczne refleksje na temat regulacji prawnej i praktyki jej stosowania

Bartosz Kołaczkowski, Małgorzata Ratajczak
Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych
Intellectual Property Rights and Media
article

Ocena programowa kierunku studiów o profilu ogólnoakademickim – krytyczne refleksje na temat regulacji prawnej i praktyki jej stosowania

Bartosz Kołaczkowski, Małgorzata Ratajczak
article en

Abstract

The study addresses the issue of the program evaluation of general academic studies carried out by the Polish Accreditation Committee. The analysis of the legal regulation and practice of program evaluation indicated that doubts and reservations concern both fundamental issues and specific solutions. The expression of the criteria for the program evaluation of general academic studies in an internal act – the Statute of the Polish Accreditation Committee – was considered controversial. According to the authors, the model of the self-assessment report is overly elaborate. They assessed as deficient the criteria for the selection of experts, as well as the lack of sufficiently precise regulation of the scope of their authority during programme evaluation. In conclusion, they suggested some amendments to the current legislation.

Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz SejmowychVol. 81(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Intellectual Property Rights and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.