Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives

In response to the disruption of gas supplies from Russia following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, European politicians and public utilities appealed to citizens and customers to conserve natural gas. Moreover, they strengthened economic incentives for gas conservation. In fact, a substantial amount of natural gas was saved during the winter of 2022/23. This raises the question to what extent this success is attributable to government and corporate means to foster energy conservation in the crisis, including energy policies such as the German government's "gas price brake," gas-saving programs launched by public utilities, and consumers' individual pricing schemes. We analyzed the effectiveness of these means using a survey and a field experiment with a German gas supplier and show that, while household savings during the crisis were substantial, economic incentives did not significantly change behavior. Indeed, demand for gas is largely price inelastic. A large majority of consumers do not understand the incentives arising from the gas price brake, and when they do, they do not respond. Likewise, consumers do not react to the design of the utilities' gas-saving program. These findings suggest that i) citizens' response to marginal individual economic incentives contributes little to overall gas savings, and ii) the crisis, along with the extensive societal engagement it generated, likely shifted the public's mindset about energy consumption, making conservation a social priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411740121
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives

Markus Dertwinkel‐Kalt, Matthias Sutter, Axel Ockenfels, Christoph Feldhaus
13 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.33
article

Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives

Markus Dertwinkel‐Kalt, Matthias Sutter, Axel Ockenfels, Christoph Feldhaus
article en
13 citations

Abstract

In response to the disruption of gas supplies from Russia following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, European politicians and public utilities appealed to citizens and customers to conserve natural gas. Moreover, they strengthened economic incentives for gas conservation. In fact, a substantial amount of natural gas was saved during the winter of 2022/23. This raises the question to what extent this success is attributable to government and corporate means to foster energy conservation in the crisis, including energy policies such as the German government's "gas price brake," gas-saving programs launched by public utilities, and consumers' individual pricing schemes. We analyzed the effectiveness of these means using a survey and a field experiment with a German gas supplier and show that, while household savings during the crisis were substantial, economic incentives did not significantly change behavior. Indeed, demand for gas is largely price inelastic. A large majority of consumers do not understand the incentives arising from the gas price brake, and when they do, they do not respond. Likewise, consumers do not react to the design of the utilities' gas-saving program. These findings suggest that i) citizens' response to marginal individual economic incentives contributes little to overall gas savings, and ii) the crisis, along with the extensive societal engagement it generated, likely shifted the public's mindset about energy consumption, making conservation a social priority.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(48)
Venice International University (IT), University of Cologne (DE), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Münster (DE), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.