Integrative methodologies for evaluating bidirectional impacts in University-Community engagements

University-community engagement represents a critical dimension of higher education institutions’ roles in society, focusing on fostering mutually beneficial partnerships between universities and local communities. This study reviews and synthesizes existing methodologies for evaluating the bidirectional impact of these engagements, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive framework that integrates both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The review identifies key approaches such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for measuring efficiency, Ex-Post Im- pact Assessment for quantifying economic, social, and psychological im- pacts, and Socially Modified Economic Valuation (SMEV) for assessing social value. Furthermore, qualitative methodologies, including Sequential Explanatory Design and Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB), are discussed for their role in capturing the nuanced, context-specific benefits of these engagements. The proposed integrative methodology combines these approaches to provide a holistic evaluation framework that not only measures tangible outcomes but also captures the intangible benefits that contribute to the long-term sustainability of university-community partnerships. The application of this methodology is illustrated through illustrative data, demonstrating its utility in real-world contexts. This study underscores the importance of adopting a multifaceted evaluation strategy to accurately assess the impact of university-community engagements and inform future policy development. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on enhancing the societal role of universities by ensuring that engagement initiatives are both effective and sustainable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
STUDIES IN EDUCATION SCIENCES
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54019/sesv5n4-002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative methodologies for evaluating bidirectional impacts in University-Community engagements

Fernando Rojas
1 citations
STUDIES IN EDUCATION SCIENCES
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
article

Integrative methodologies for evaluating bidirectional impacts in University-Community engagements

Fernando Rojas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

University-community engagement represents a critical dimension of higher education institutions’ roles in society, focusing on fostering mutually beneficial partnerships between universities and local communities. This study reviews and synthesizes existing methodologies for evaluating the bidirectional impact of these engagements, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive framework that integrates both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The review identifies key approaches such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for measuring efficiency, Ex-Post Im- pact Assessment for quantifying economic, social, and psychological im- pacts, and Socially Modified Economic Valuation (SMEV) for assessing social value. Furthermore, qualitative methodologies, including Sequential Explanatory Design and Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB), are discussed for their role in capturing the nuanced, context-specific benefits of these engagements. The proposed integrative methodology combines these approaches to provide a holistic evaluation framework that not only measures tangible outcomes but also captures the intangible benefits that contribute to the long-term sustainability of university-community partnerships. The application of this methodology is illustrated through illustrative data, demonstrating its utility in real-world contexts. This study underscores the importance of adopting a multifaceted evaluation strategy to accurately assess the impact of university-community engagements and inform future policy development. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on enhancing the societal role of universities by ensuring that engagement initiatives are both effective and sustainable.

STUDIES IN EDUCATION SCIENCESVol. 5(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.