The Role of Affectivity in Human Flourishing. The Internal Relation between Affectivity, Ethos, and Bonds

In this article I will attempt to show the role of affectivity in human flourishing. For that it is necessary overcome a first impression: That there is no relation between affectivity, ethos, and bonds. This does not correspond to real experience, but rather to a dualistic prejudice that radically separates “happening” (affectivity) from “acting” and “relating” (ethos and bonds). In fact, “happening,” “acting” and “relating” are three dimensions of human existence which are never given separately, and therefore must be integrated in one’s life. Every “happening”, to be integrated, requires its transformation into “action,” and every “action” has at its basis a “happening”-at least as a motive to act. Far from enclosing the person in his subjectivity by isolating him from otherness, affectivity always opens him to the world and to others, so that the essential relationality of the person is manifested in it. These three components-affectivity, ethos, and bonds—are necessarily interrelated, and a good education consists in wisely linking what subjectivity feels with the other components to establish a meaningful connection with what or who one is relating to.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54026/crpbs/10113
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Affectivity in Human Flourishing. The Internal Relation between Affectivity, Ethos, and Bonds

Antonio Malo
Ethics in Business and Education
article

The Role of Affectivity in Human Flourishing. The Internal Relation between Affectivity, Ethos, and Bonds

Antonio Malo
article en

Abstract

In this article I will attempt to show the role of affectivity in human flourishing. For that it is necessary overcome a first impression: That there is no relation between affectivity, ethos, and bonds. This does not correspond to real experience, but rather to a dualistic prejudice that radically separates “happening” (affectivity) from “acting” and “relating” (ethos and bonds). In fact, “happening,” “acting” and “relating” are three dimensions of human existence which are never given separately, and therefore must be integrated in one’s life. Every “happening”, to be integrated, requires its transformation into “action,” and every “action” has at its basis a “happening”-at least as a motive to act. Far from enclosing the person in his subjectivity by isolating him from otherness, affectivity always opens him to the world and to others, so that the essential relationality of the person is manifested in it. These three components-affectivity, ethos, and bonds—are necessarily interrelated, and a good education consists in wisely linking what subjectivity feels with the other components to establish a meaningful connection with what or who one is relating to.

Vol. 5(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.