Technical Complications Associated with Embolic Protection Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Implications, and Rescue Maneuvers

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, clinical implications, and rescue maneuvers of technical complications related to embolic protection devices (EPDs) during carotid artery stenting (CAS). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed all patients who had undergone CAS with EPDs between April 2018 and March 2024. The incidence and types of technical complication associated with EPDs were assessed. Clinical, angiographical, and procedural factors were analyzed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of EPD-related adverse events. Various rescue techniques for managing adverse events were investigated based on the procedure record. <b>Results:</b> Of the 158 enrolled patients, the rate of EPD-related technical complications was 23.4% (<i>n</i> = 37). Among them, complicated filter retrieval was the most common adverse event (<i>n</i> = 23, 14.6%). Older age, a higher degree of residual stenosis, and the type of the EPD were significant risk factors for complicated filter retrieval (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although distal thrombus migration requiring thrombectomy was more frequent in patients with complicated filter removal (2.2% vs. 13.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.041), there was no significant increase in postprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. When complicated filter retrieval occurred, careful to-and-fro movement of the patients' neck, such as rotation, or asking them to swallow was tried first in all 23 patients. When these attempts failed, manipulation of a curved-tip guiding catheter, the balloon bridge technique, and alternative use of a 5 Fr angiocatheter as a retrieval sheath were sequentially tried, and all filters were successfully retrieved. <b>Conclusions:</b> Complicated filter retrieval was the most common technical complication during CAS. Various rescue techniques for successful filter removal were effective for ensuring safety of CAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14232622
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Complications Associated with Embolic Protection Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Implications, and Rescue Maneuvers

Bo Kyu Kim, Inseon Ryoo, Hye Na Jung, Sung‐Hye You et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
0.84
article

Technical Complications Associated with Embolic Protection Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Implications, and Rescue Maneuvers

Bo Kyu Kim, Inseon Ryoo, Hye Na Jung, Sung‐Hye You, Byungjun Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, clinical implications, and rescue maneuvers of technical complications related to embolic protection devices (EPDs) during carotid artery stenting (CAS). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed all patients who had undergone CAS with EPDs between April 2018 and March 2024. The incidence and types of technical complication associated with EPDs were assessed. Clinical, angiographical, and procedural factors were analyzed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of EPD-related adverse events. Various rescue techniques for managing adverse events were investigated based on the procedure record. <b>Results:</b> Of the 158 enrolled patients, the rate of EPD-related technical complications was 23.4% (<i>n</i> = 37). Among them, complicated filter retrieval was the most common adverse event (<i>n</i> = 23, 14.6%). Older age, a higher degree of residual stenosis, and the type of the EPD were significant risk factors for complicated filter retrieval (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although distal thrombus migration requiring thrombectomy was more frequent in patients with complicated filter removal (2.2% vs. 13.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.041), there was no significant increase in postprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. When complicated filter retrieval occurred, careful to-and-fro movement of the patients' neck, such as rotation, or asking them to swallow was tried first in all 23 patients. When these attempts failed, manipulation of a curved-tip guiding catheter, the balloon bridge technique, and alternative use of a 5 Fr angiocatheter as a retrieval sheath were sequentially tried, and all filters were successfully retrieved. <b>Conclusions:</b> Complicated filter retrieval was the most common technical complication during CAS. Various rescue techniques for successful filter removal were effective for ensuring safety of CAS.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(23)
Korea University (KR), Korea University Medical Center (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.