Two Types of Size-Biased Samples When Modeling Extreme Phenomena

The present research deals with two possible sources of bias that arise naturally from the selection procedure when modeling extreme phenomena. More specifically, the first type of bias arises when an r-size-biased sample from a set of maximum values is selected, while the second one occurs when a random sample of maxima is observed where each observation is obtained by a series of r-size-biased samples. The concept of weighted distributions is used, not only to describe both cases but also as an adjustment methodology. The differences between the two types of bias are discussed, while the impact of ignoring the bias on the estimation of the unknown parameters is revealed both theoretically and with the use of a simulation study, under the assumption that the parent distribution belongs to the Fréchet maximum domain of attraction. Finally, numerical results indicate that ignorance of the bias or misspecification of r results in inconsistent estimators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stats
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7040081
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Types of Size-Biased Samples When Modeling Extreme Phenomena

George Tzavelas, Polychronis Εconomou, Apostolos Batsidis
Stats
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Two Types of Size-Biased Samples When Modeling Extreme Phenomena

George Tzavelas, Polychronis Εconomou, Apostolos Batsidis
article en

Abstract

The present research deals with two possible sources of bias that arise naturally from the selection procedure when modeling extreme phenomena. More specifically, the first type of bias arises when an r-size-biased sample from a set of maximum values is selected, while the second one occurs when a random sample of maxima is observed where each observation is obtained by a series of r-size-biased samples. The concept of weighted distributions is used, not only to describe both cases but also as an adjustment methodology. The differences between the two types of bias are discussed, while the impact of ignoring the bias on the estimation of the unknown parameters is revealed both theoretically and with the use of a simulation study, under the assumption that the parent distribution belongs to the Fréchet maximum domain of attraction. Finally, numerical results indicate that ignorance of the bias or misspecification of r results in inconsistent estimators.

StatsVol. 7(4)
University of Piraeus (GR), University of Patras (GR), University of Ioannina (GR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two Types of Size-Biased Samples When Modeling Extreme Phenomena — George Tzavelas, Polychronis Εconomou, et al. · Stats (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS