Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a surface runoff model using ensemble of artificial rainfall experiments

Abstract Surface runoff models are essential for designing water and soil protection measures. However, they often exhibit uncertainty in both parameterization and results. Typically, uncertainty is evaluated by comparing model realizations with measured data. However, this approach is constrained by limited data availability, preventing comprehensive uncertainty assessment. To overcome this limitation, we employed the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology to conduct sensitivity and uncertainty analyses on a series of surface runoff models. These models were based on an ensemble of artificial rainfall experiments comprising 77 scenarios with similar settings. We utilized the rainfall-runoff-erosion model SMODERP2D to simulate the experiments and employed Differential Evolution, a heuristic optimization method, to generate sets of behavioural models for each experiment. Additionally, we evaluated the sensitivity and uncertainty with respect to two variables; water level and surface runoff. Our results indicate similar sensitivity of water level and surface runoff to most parameters, with a generally high equifinality. The ensemble of models revealed high uncertainty in bare soil models, especially under dry initial soil water conditions where the lag time for runoff onset was the largest (e.g. runoff coefficient ranged between 0–0.8). Conversely, models with wet initial soil water conditions exhibited lower uncertainty compared to those with dry initial soil water content (e.g. runoff coefficient ranged between 0.6 – 1). Models with crop cover showed a multimodal distribution in water flow and volume, possibly due to variations in crop type and growth stages. Therefore, distinguishing these crop properties could reduce uncertainty. Utilizing an ensemble of models for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis demonstrated its potential in identifying sources of uncertainty, thereby enhancing the robustness and generalizability of such analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2024-0021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a surface runoff model using ensemble of artificial rainfall experiments

Jakub Jeřábek, Petr Kavka
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.40
article

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a surface runoff model using ensemble of artificial rainfall experiments

Jakub Jeřábek, Petr Kavka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Surface runoff models are essential for designing water and soil protection measures. However, they often exhibit uncertainty in both parameterization and results. Typically, uncertainty is evaluated by comparing model realizations with measured data. However, this approach is constrained by limited data availability, preventing comprehensive uncertainty assessment. To overcome this limitation, we employed the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology to conduct sensitivity and uncertainty analyses on a series of surface runoff models. These models were based on an ensemble of artificial rainfall experiments comprising 77 scenarios with similar settings. We utilized the rainfall-runoff-erosion model SMODERP2D to simulate the experiments and employed Differential Evolution, a heuristic optimization method, to generate sets of behavioural models for each experiment. Additionally, we evaluated the sensitivity and uncertainty with respect to two variables; water level and surface runoff. Our results indicate similar sensitivity of water level and surface runoff to most parameters, with a generally high equifinality. The ensemble of models revealed high uncertainty in bare soil models, especially under dry initial soil water conditions where the lag time for runoff onset was the largest (e.g. runoff coefficient ranged between 0–0.8). Conversely, models with wet initial soil water conditions exhibited lower uncertainty compared to those with dry initial soil water content (e.g. runoff coefficient ranged between 0.6 – 1). Models with crop cover showed a multimodal distribution in water flow and volume, possibly due to variations in crop type and growth stages. Therefore, distinguishing these crop properties could reduce uncertainty. Utilizing an ensemble of models for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis demonstrated its potential in identifying sources of uncertainty, thereby enhancing the robustness and generalizability of such analyses.

Journal of Hydrology and HydromechanicsVol. 72(4)
Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Clean water and sanitation, Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.