Accuracy of Discrete-Continuum Solvation Model for Cations: A Benchmark Study
Metal ions play important roles in chemistry, biochemistry, and material sciences. Accurately modeling ion solvation is crucial for simulating ion-containing systems. There are different models for ion solvation in computational chemistry, such as the explicit model, continuum model, and discrete-continuum model. Compared to the explicit model and continuum model, the discrete-continuum model of solvation is a hybrid solvation model in which the first solvation shell is described explicitly, and the remainder of the bulk liquid is characterized by a continuum model, which provides an excellent balance between accuracy and computational costs. This work serves as a systematic benchmark of the discrete-continuum model for the solvation of cations with +2, +3, and +4 charges. The calculated hydration free energies (HFEs) of ions were compared to those obtained by the SMD continuum model alone and the available experimental data. The discrete-continuum model showed improved performance over the continuum model alone via a smaller overall error and more consistent performance. Experimentally observed trends, such as the Irving-Williams series, are generally reproduced. In contrast, greater overall error was obtained for Ln<sup>3+</sup> ions, and the HFE trend along the Ln<sup>3+</sup> series was more difficult to reproduce, indicating these ions are challenging to model by the discrete-continuum model and continuum model. Overall, the discrete-continuum model is recommended to calculate the HFEs of cations when experimental data are not available.
Authors
- Bailey A. Hanson
- Madelyn Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-8350)
- Pengfei Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-5935)
Institutions
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04034
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.35
Funders
- Loyola University Chicago