Accuracy of Discrete-Continuum Solvation Model for Cations: A Benchmark Study

Metal ions play important roles in chemistry, biochemistry, and material sciences. Accurately modeling ion solvation is crucial for simulating ion-containing systems. There are different models for ion solvation in computational chemistry, such as the explicit model, continuum model, and discrete-continuum model. Compared to the explicit model and continuum model, the discrete-continuum model of solvation is a hybrid solvation model in which the first solvation shell is described explicitly, and the remainder of the bulk liquid is characterized by a continuum model, which provides an excellent balance between accuracy and computational costs. This work serves as a systematic benchmark of the discrete-continuum model for the solvation of cations with +2, +3, and +4 charges. The calculated hydration free energies (HFEs) of ions were compared to those obtained by the SMD continuum model alone and the available experimental data. The discrete-continuum model showed improved performance over the continuum model alone via a smaller overall error and more consistent performance. Experimentally observed trends, such as the Irving-Williams series, are generally reproduced. In contrast, greater overall error was obtained for Ln<sup>3+</sup> ions, and the HFE trend along the Ln<sup>3+</sup> series was more difficult to reproduce, indicating these ions are challenging to model by the discrete-continuum model and continuum model. Overall, the discrete-continuum model is recommended to calculate the HFEs of cations when experimental data are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04034
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Discrete-Continuum Solvation Model for Cations: A Benchmark Study

Bailey A. Hanson, Madelyn Smith, Pengfei Li
4 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
1.35
article

Accuracy of Discrete-Continuum Solvation Model for Cations: A Benchmark Study

Bailey A. Hanson, Madelyn Smith, Pengfei Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Metal ions play important roles in chemistry, biochemistry, and material sciences. Accurately modeling ion solvation is crucial for simulating ion-containing systems. There are different models for ion solvation in computational chemistry, such as the explicit model, continuum model, and discrete-continuum model. Compared to the explicit model and continuum model, the discrete-continuum model of solvation is a hybrid solvation model in which the first solvation shell is described explicitly, and the remainder of the bulk liquid is characterized by a continuum model, which provides an excellent balance between accuracy and computational costs. This work serves as a systematic benchmark of the discrete-continuum model for the solvation of cations with +2, +3, and +4 charges. The calculated hydration free energies (HFEs) of ions were compared to those obtained by the SMD continuum model alone and the available experimental data. The discrete-continuum model showed improved performance over the continuum model alone via a smaller overall error and more consistent performance. Experimentally observed trends, such as the Irving-Williams series, are generally reproduced. In contrast, greater overall error was obtained for Ln<sup>3+</sup> ions, and the HFE trend along the Ln<sup>3+</sup> series was more difficult to reproduce, indicating these ions are challenging to model by the discrete-continuum model and continuum model. Overall, the discrete-continuum model is recommended to calculate the HFEs of cations when experimental data are not available.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry BVol. 128(48)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Loyola University Chicago
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.