How AI from Automated Driving Systems Can Contribute to the Assessment of Human Driving Behavior

This paper proposes a novel approach to measuring human driving performance by using the AI capabilities of automated driving systems, illustrated through three example scenarios. Traditionally, the assessment of human driving has followed a bottom-up methodology, where raw data are compared to fixed thresholds, yielding indicators such as the number of hard braking events. However, acceleration threshold exceedances are often heavily influenced by the driving context. We propose a top-down context-aware approach to driving assessments, in which recordings of human-driven vehicles are analyzed by an automated driving system. By comparing the human driver’s speed to the AI’s recommended speed, we derive a level of disagreement that can be used to distinguish between hard braking caused by aggressive driving and emergency braking in response to a critical event. The proposed method may serve as an alternative to the metrics currently used by some insurance companies and may serve as a template for future AI-based driver assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Robotics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13120169
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI from Automated Driving Systems Can Contribute to the Assessment of Human Driving Behavior

Dimitra Dodou, Olger Siebinga, Joost de Winter, Tom Driessen et al.
2 citations
Robotics
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

How AI from Automated Driving Systems Can Contribute to the Assessment of Human Driving Behavior

Dimitra Dodou, Olger Siebinga, Joost de Winter, Tom Driessen, Dick de Waard, Thomas de Boer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel approach to measuring human driving performance by using the AI capabilities of automated driving systems, illustrated through three example scenarios. Traditionally, the assessment of human driving has followed a bottom-up methodology, where raw data are compared to fixed thresholds, yielding indicators such as the number of hard braking events. However, acceleration threshold exceedances are often heavily influenced by the driving context. We propose a top-down context-aware approach to driving assessments, in which recordings of human-driven vehicles are analyzed by an automated driving system. By comparing the human driver’s speed to the AI’s recommended speed, we derive a level of disagreement that can be used to distinguish between hard braking caused by aggressive driving and emergency braking in response to a critical event. The proposed method may serve as an alternative to the metrics currently used by some insurance companies and may serve as a template for future AI-based driver assessment.

RoboticsVol. 13(12)
University of Groningen (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How AI from Automated Driving Systems Can Contribute to the Assessment of Human Driving Behavior — Dimitra Dodou, Olger Siebinga, et al. · Robotics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS