Normative CLEFT-Q Data From the General Dutch Population

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as the CLEFT-Q, have become essential for outcomes in patients with CL/P. Normative values of the CLEFT-Q for non-CL/P peers have not yet been established. This study aims to establish normative values for the CLEFT-Q in the general Dutch population. Dutch nationals aged 16-24 years without CL/P were recruited through an online survey. Participants completed the CLEFT-Q, excluding the lip scar and eating and drinking scales. Data were weighted based on the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics. Normative values were calculated as means and standard deviations, stratified by sex and education category. Tobit regression models were used to analyze associations between CLEFT-Q scores and demographic variables. In total, 870 participants responded, of which 160 were excluded due to potential craniofacial anomalies. Significant variations in CLEFT-Q scores based on sex were found, with females scoring lower than males. Level of education had a modest impact on CLEFT-Q scores, with lower education having lower scores on certain scales. Age marginally influenced CLEFT-Q scores, with younger participants scoring lower than older participants. Positive correlations were found between all CLEFT-Q scales. The strongest correlation was observed between the social and school functioning scales. This study provides the first set of normative values for the CLEFT-Q in the Dutch general population. Significant differences in CLEFT-Q scores based on sex, level of education and age were found. These normative values are useful for clinicians interpreting CLEFT-Q scores and help make informed decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010882
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative CLEFT-Q Data From the General Dutch Population

Philip A.J. van der Goes, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, Saranda Ombashi, Sarah L. Versnel et al.
1 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
0.55
article

Normative CLEFT-Q Data From the General Dutch Population

Philip A.J. van der Goes, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, Saranda Ombashi, Sarah L. Versnel, Victor L. van Roey, Irene M. J. Mathijssen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as the CLEFT-Q, have become essential for outcomes in patients with CL/P. Normative values of the CLEFT-Q for non-CL/P peers have not yet been established. This study aims to establish normative values for the CLEFT-Q in the general Dutch population. Dutch nationals aged 16-24 years without CL/P were recruited through an online survey. Participants completed the CLEFT-Q, excluding the lip scar and eating and drinking scales. Data were weighted based on the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics. Normative values were calculated as means and standard deviations, stratified by sex and education category. Tobit regression models were used to analyze associations between CLEFT-Q scores and demographic variables. In total, 870 participants responded, of which 160 were excluded due to potential craniofacial anomalies. Significant variations in CLEFT-Q scores based on sex were found, with females scoring lower than males. Level of education had a modest impact on CLEFT-Q scores, with lower education having lower scores on certain scales. Age marginally influenced CLEFT-Q scores, with younger participants scoring lower than older participants. Positive correlations were found between all CLEFT-Q scales. The strongest correlation was observed between the social and school functioning scales. This study provides the first set of normative values for the CLEFT-Q in the Dutch general population. Significant differences in CLEFT-Q scores based on sex, level of education and age were found. These normative values are useful for clinicians interpreting CLEFT-Q scores and help make informed decisions.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(3)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), ERN GUARD-Heart (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.