Cost-effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials

It has been accepted worldwide that the cost as well as the effectiveness and toxicity is an essential part in the assessment of medical interventions. Following several countries, in Japan, the evaluation of cost-effectiveness was put into effect in 2019 . There are mainly two methods in cost-effective analysis: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials and analysis using decision analytic modeling. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials, where utility and cost data are obtained from individual patients, has the advantage of high internal validity. In economic evaluation alongside trials, censoring frequently occurs in acquiring utility and cost data from individual patients and techniques of survival analysis is necessary to consider censoring into account. Methods using Kaplan-Meier survival estimator and inverse-probability weighting estimator are frequently used to account for censoring in the estimation of effectiveness and cost. In this paper, we provide an outline of the statistical methods on economic evaluation alongside trials, stressing especially the estimation of effectiveness and cost using survival analysis techniques to account for censoring

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Biometrics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5691/jjb.45.155
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials

Nanami Taketomi, Nobuki Imano, Kenta Murotani, Tetsuo Saito
Japanese Journal of Biometrics
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials

Nanami Taketomi, Nobuki Imano, Kenta Murotani, Tetsuo Saito
article en

Abstract

It has been accepted worldwide that the cost as well as the effectiveness and toxicity is an essential part in the assessment of medical interventions. Following several countries, in Japan, the evaluation of cost-effectiveness was put into effect in 2019 . There are mainly two methods in cost-effective analysis: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials and analysis using decision analytic modeling. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials, where utility and cost data are obtained from individual patients, has the advantage of high internal validity. In economic evaluation alongside trials, censoring frequently occurs in acquiring utility and cost data from individual patients and techniques of survival analysis is necessary to consider censoring into account. Methods using Kaplan-Meier survival estimator and inverse-probability weighting estimator are frequently used to account for censoring in the estimation of effectiveness and cost. In this paper, we provide an outline of the statistical methods on economic evaluation alongside trials, stressing especially the estimation of effectiveness and cost using survival analysis techniques to account for censoring

Japanese Journal of BiometricsVol. 45(2)
Kurume University (JP), Hiroshima University (JP), Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials — Nanami Taketomi, Nobuki Imano, et al. · Japanese Journal of Biometrics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS