Does artificial intelligence bias perceptions of environmental challenges?

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how humans obtain information about environmental challenges. Yet the outputs of AI chatbots contain biases that affect how humans view these challenges. Here, we use qualitative and quantitative content analysis to identify bias in AI chatbot characterizations of the issues, causes, consequences, and solutions to environmental challenges. By manually coding an original dataset of 1512 chatbot responses across multiple environmental challenges and chatbots, we identify a number of overlapping areas of bias. Most notably, chatbots are prone to proposing incremental solutions to environmental challenges that draw heavily on past experience and avoid more radical changes to existing economic, social, and political systems. We also find that chatbots are reluctant to assign accountability to investors and avoid associating environmental challenges with broader social justice issues. These findings present new dimensions of bias in AI and auger towards a more critical treatment of AI’s hidden environmental impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad95a2
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does artificial intelligence bias perceptions of environmental challenges?

Hamish van der Ven, Muh. Syukron, Diego Corry, Rawie Elnur et al.
7 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
7.90
article

Does artificial intelligence bias perceptions of environmental challenges?

Hamish van der Ven, Muh. Syukron, Diego Corry, Rawie Elnur, Viola Jasmine Provost, Niklas Tappauf
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how humans obtain information about environmental challenges. Yet the outputs of AI chatbots contain biases that affect how humans view these challenges. Here, we use qualitative and quantitative content analysis to identify bias in AI chatbot characterizations of the issues, causes, consequences, and solutions to environmental challenges. By manually coding an original dataset of 1512 chatbot responses across multiple environmental challenges and chatbots, we identify a number of overlapping areas of bias. Most notably, chatbots are prone to proposing incremental solutions to environmental challenges that draw heavily on past experience and avoid more radical changes to existing economic, social, and political systems. We also find that chatbots are reluctant to assign accountability to investors and avoid associating environmental challenges with broader social justice issues. These findings present new dimensions of bias in AI and auger towards a more critical treatment of AI’s hidden environmental impacts.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.