A signal model for fat‐suppressed T<sub>1</sub>‐mapping and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI with interrupted spoiled gradient‐echo readout
The conventional gradient-echo steady-state signal model is the basis of various spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) based quantitative MRI models, including variable flip angle (VFA) MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE). However, including preparation pulses, such as fat suppression or saturation bands, disrupts the steady-state and leads to a bias in T<sub>1</sub> and DCE parameter estimates. This work introduces a signal model that improves the accuracy of VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping and DCE for interrupted spoiled gradient-echo (I-SPGR) acquisitions. The proposed model was applied to a VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping I-SPGR sequence in the Gold Standard T<sub>1</sub>-phantom (3 T), in the brain of four healthy volunteers (3 T), and to an abdominal DCE examination (1.5 T). T<sub>1</sub>-values obtained with the proposed and conventional model were compared to reference T<sub>1</sub>-values. Bland-Altman analysis (phantom) and analysis of variance (in vivo) were used to test whether bias from both methods was significantly different (p = 0.05). The proposed model outperformed the conventional model by decreasing the bias in the phantom with respect to the phantom reference values (mean bias -2 vs. -35% at 3 T) and in vivo with respect to the conventional SPGR (-6 vs. -37% bias in T<sub>1</sub>, p < 0.01). The proposed signal model estimated approximately 48% (depending on baseline T<sub>1</sub>) higher contrast concentrations in vivo, which resulted in decreased DCE pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of up to 35%. The proposed signal model improves the accuracy of quantitative parameter estimation from disrupted steady-state I-SPGR sequences. It therefore provides a flexible method for applying fat suppression, saturation bands, and other preparation pulses in VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping and DCE.
Authors
- Oliver J. Gurney‐Champion (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1750-6617)
- Joost P.A. Kuijer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-0427)
- J. Tim Marcus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-6407)
- Leo Heunks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-4665)
- Gustav J. Strijkers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-5058)
- Bram F. Coolen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-653X)
- Aart J. Nederveen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5477-973X)
- Cristina Lavini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8204-1807)
- Myrte Wennen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-936X)
- Wilhelm Stehling
Institutions
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Dutch Cancer Society (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- NMR in Biomedicine
- Published
- 2024-11-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5289
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.81
Funders
- ZonMw