Feasibility study of modularized pin ridge filter implementation in proton FLASH planning for liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

<i>Objective.</i>We previously developed a FLASH planning framework for streamlined pin-ridge-filter (pin-RF) design, demonstrating its feasibility for single-energy proton FLASH planning. In this study, we refined the pin-RF design for easy assembly using reusable modules, focusing on its application in liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR).<i>Approach.</i>This framework generates an intermediate intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan and translates it into step widths and thicknesses of pin-RFs for a single-energy FLASH plan. Parameters like energy spacing, monitor unit limit, and spot quantity were adjusted during IMPT planning, resulting in pin-RFs assembled using predefined modules with widths from 1 to 6 mm, each with a water-equivalent-thickness of 5 mm. This approach was validated on three liver SABR cases. FLASH doses, quantified using the FLASH effectiveness model at 1-5 Gy thresholds, were compared to conventional IMPT (IMPT-CONV) doses to assess clinical benefits.<i>Main results.</i>The highest demand for 6 mm width modules, moderate for 2-4 mm, and minimal for 1- and 5-mm modules were shown across all cases. At lower dose thresholds, the two-beam case reduced indicators including liver<i>V</i><sub>21Gy</sub>and skin<i>D</i><sub>max</sub>by >19.4%, while the three-beam cases showed reductions⩽11.4%, indicating the need for higher fractional beam doses for an enhanced FLASH effect. Positive clinical benefits were seen only in the two-beam case at the 5 Gy threshold. At the 1 Gy threshold, the two-beam FLASH plan outperformed the IMPT-CONV plan, reducing dose indicators for all relevant normal tissues by up to 31.2%. In contrast, the three-beam cases showed negative clinical benefits, with skin<i>D</i><sub>max</sub>and liver<i>V</i><sub>21Gy</sub>increasing by up to 17.4% due to lower fractional beam doses and closer beam arrangements.<i>Significance.</i>This study evaluated the feasibility of modularizing streamlined pin-RFs in single-energy proton FLASH planning for liver SABR, offering guidance on optimal module composition and strategies to enhance FLASH planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad95d6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility study of modularized pin ridge filter implementation in proton FLASH planning for liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

Jun Zhou, Jufri Setianegara, David S. Yu, Chaoqiong Ma et al.
2 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
0.84
article

Feasibility study of modularized pin ridge filter implementation in proton FLASH planning for liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

Jun Zhou, Jufri Setianegara, David S. Yu, Chaoqiong Ma, Yuan Gao, Xiaofeng Yang, Pretesh Patel, Yinan Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>We previously developed a FLASH planning framework for streamlined pin-ridge-filter (pin-RF) design, demonstrating its feasibility for single-energy proton FLASH planning. In this study, we refined the pin-RF design for easy assembly using reusable modules, focusing on its application in liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR).<i>Approach.</i>This framework generates an intermediate intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan and translates it into step widths and thicknesses of pin-RFs for a single-energy FLASH plan. Parameters like energy spacing, monitor unit limit, and spot quantity were adjusted during IMPT planning, resulting in pin-RFs assembled using predefined modules with widths from 1 to 6 mm, each with a water-equivalent-thickness of 5 mm. This approach was validated on three liver SABR cases. FLASH doses, quantified using the FLASH effectiveness model at 1-5 Gy thresholds, were compared to conventional IMPT (IMPT-CONV) doses to assess clinical benefits.<i>Main results.</i>The highest demand for 6 mm width modules, moderate for 2-4 mm, and minimal for 1- and 5-mm modules were shown across all cases. At lower dose thresholds, the two-beam case reduced indicators including liver<i>V</i><sub>21Gy</sub>and skin<i>D</i><sub>max</sub>by >19.4%, while the three-beam cases showed reductions⩽11.4%, indicating the need for higher fractional beam doses for an enhanced FLASH effect. Positive clinical benefits were seen only in the two-beam case at the 5 Gy threshold. At the 1 Gy threshold, the two-beam FLASH plan outperformed the IMPT-CONV plan, reducing dose indicators for all relevant normal tissues by up to 31.2%. In contrast, the three-beam cases showed negative clinical benefits, with skin<i>D</i><sub>max</sub>and liver<i>V</i><sub>21Gy</sub>increasing by up to 17.4% due to lower fractional beam doses and closer beam arrangements.<i>Significance.</i>This study evaluated the feasibility of modularizing streamlined pin-RFs in single-energy proton FLASH planning for liver SABR, offering guidance on optimal module composition and strategies to enhance FLASH planning.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(24)
Emory Healthcare (US), Emory University (US), Emory University Hospital (US), Piedmont Cancer Institute (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.