Carbon implications of sovereign wealth funds

Abstract As of May 2022, assets under management of these funds amount to 9.91 trillion USD. Hence, sovereign wealth funds have a significant influence on the financial system due to their substantial economic value. As the current practice of portfolio management is outdated, due to a lack of relevant input factors exploring environmental, social and governance issues, the study explores two commonly used portfolio management models; the Markowitz model and the conditional value‐at‐risk model, and proposes a new model integrating sustainability indicators. Results indicate significant economic and environmental differences between sustainable and conventional investments for sovereign wealth funds. To ensure global progress on emission reduction, these funds should implement climate change strategies to encourage and accelerate the low‐carbon transition while continuing to manage their investment portfolios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon implications of sovereign wealth funds

Franco Ruzzenenti, Yuli Shan, Klaus Hubacek, Elena Vaagenes Andersen et al.
1 citations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
0.55
article

Carbon implications of sovereign wealth funds

Franco Ruzzenenti, Yuli Shan, Klaus Hubacek, Elena Vaagenes Andersen, Jakob Willem Wilts
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As of May 2022, assets under management of these funds amount to 9.91 trillion USD. Hence, sovereign wealth funds have a significant influence on the financial system due to their substantial economic value. As the current practice of portfolio management is outdated, due to a lack of relevant input factors exploring environmental, social and governance issues, the study explores two commonly used portfolio management models; the Markowitz model and the conditional value‐at‐risk model, and proposes a new model integrating sustainability indicators. Results indicate significant economic and environmental differences between sustainable and conventional investments for sovereign wealth funds. To ensure global progress on emission reduction, these funds should implement climate change strategies to encourage and accelerate the low‐carbon transition while continuing to manage their investment portfolios.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 32(2)
University of Groningen (NL), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
State Capitalism and Financial Governance
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon implications of sovereign wealth funds — Franco Ruzzenenti, Yuli Shan, et al. · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS