T cells from newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients have enhanced responsiveness to <scp>CD46</scp> activation

Abstract Objective To evaluate the responsiveness of T cells from newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients to CD46 co‐stimulation, a membrane co‐factor protein potentially involved in MS pathogenesis. Methods T cells from MS patients and non‐diseased symptomatic controls (SC) were activated in vitro with or without αCD46 antibody co‐stimulation. Cytokine responses were measured to assess T‐cell responsiveness. The fold difference between αCD3/CD46 and αCD3/isotype responses was calculated to determine the enhancement of CD46 activation in MS compared with SC. Additionally, the CD46 receptor phenotype, including the expression of the CD46 CYT‐1 and CYT‐2 isoforms, was analyzed. Results In the absence of αCD46 co‐stimulation, MS T cells showed weaker cytokine responses compared to SC. However, CD46 engagement neutralized this deficit, resulting in a higher fold difference in MS αCD3/CD46 responses compared to SC. MS T cells also showed a trend toward a biased CD46 receptor phenotype, with a preference for the CD46 CYT‐2 isoform. Conclusions CD46 activation enhances T‐cell responses in newly diagnosed MS patients. A bias toward the CD46 CYT‐2 isoform is observed, aligning with the previous findings that the absence of CYT‐2 downregulation in MS might contribute to a pro‐inflammatory environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cen3.12818
Primary Topic
T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

T cells from newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients have enhanced responsiveness to CD46 activation

Bettina Bundgaard, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Per Höllsberg, Linda Sundvall et al.
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
T-cell and B-cell Immunology
article

T cells from newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients have enhanced responsiveness to CD46 activation

Bettina Bundgaard, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Per Höllsberg, Linda Sundvall, Vivien R. Schack, Litten Sørensen Rossen, Thor Petersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the responsiveness of T cells from newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients to CD46 co‐stimulation, a membrane co‐factor protein potentially involved in MS pathogenesis. Methods T cells from MS patients and non‐diseased symptomatic controls (SC) were activated in vitro with or without αCD46 antibody co‐stimulation. Cytokine responses were measured to assess T‐cell responsiveness. The fold difference between αCD3/CD46 and αCD3/isotype responses was calculated to determine the enhancement of CD46 activation in MS compared with SC. Additionally, the CD46 receptor phenotype, including the expression of the CD46 CYT‐1 and CYT‐2 isoforms, was analyzed. Results In the absence of αCD46 co‐stimulation, MS T cells showed weaker cytokine responses compared to SC. However, CD46 engagement neutralized this deficit, resulting in a higher fold difference in MS αCD3/CD46 responses compared to SC. MS T cells also showed a trend toward a biased CD46 receptor phenotype, with a preference for the CD46 CYT‐2 isoform. Conclusions CD46 activation enhances T‐cell responses in newly diagnosed MS patients. A bias toward the CD46 CYT‐2 isoform is observed, aligning with the previous findings that the absence of CYT‐2 downregulation in MS might contribute to a pro‐inflammatory environment.

Clinical and Experimental NeuroimmunologyVol. 16(3)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Dagmar Marshalls Fond, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Scleroseforeningen, Jascha Fonden, Multiple Sclerosis Society, Augustinus Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
T-cell and B-cell Immunology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.