Effect of forest thinning on the diversity and composition of macrofungal sporocarps in Pinus uncinata stands

Pine forests represent globally distributed conifers growing in a wide range of habitats within the Mediterranean basin. One example are the high-altitude mountain pine ( Pinus uncinata ) forests in the Pyrenees, which stand out for their high fungal sporocarps richness. Nevertheless, studies on the effects of forest management on sporocarps diversity in mountain pine forests have been lacking, despite their importance for optimizing multiple-use forestry practices. To address this gap, we analysed the impact of different thinning intensities on fungal sporocarp diversity and composition in P. uncinata stands in the Pyrenees. The experimental design involved a BACI approach used to compare annual sporocarp diversity and composition five years before and three years after the thinning intervention in 18 permanent plots (9 thinned and 9 control). The results indicated an absence of a thinning effect in the lighter thinning intensities (< 25 % of basal area removal) for the sporocarp richness, while negative effects emerged steadily when increasing the thinning intensity until a clear negative effect reported when removing more than 70 % of the basal area. Sporocarp evenness and Shannon index revealed a negative effect due to forest thinning, with a dominance of some species that can cope with the new stand conditions. The ECM sporocarp composition was mainly affected by interannual variability, while the saprotrophic sporocarp composition was mainly driven by site conditions. However, in both guilds, we detected a reduction of the sporocarps fructification in the higher thinning intensities. Our results indicate that lighter thinning intensities do not compromise fungal diversity conservation. Finally, forest management practices that balance timber production and fungal diversity could create opportunities to enhance the ecological, social and economic value of these forest stands, which have historically been managed exclusively for timber purposes. • Clearcuts decreased sporocarp diversity in mountain pine forests. • Lighter thinning coexisted with fungal sporocarp diversity and composition. • ECM sporocarp composition was driven by interannual variability. • Saprotrophic sporocarp composition responded to local site conditions. • Lighter thinning intensities do not conflict with the conservation of fungi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122385
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of forest thinning on the diversity and composition of macrofungal sporocarps in Pinus uncinata stands

José Antonio Bonet, Josu G. Alday, Maitane Erdozain, Juán Martínez de Aragón et al.
2 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
1.20
article

Effect of forest thinning on the diversity and composition of macrofungal sporocarps in Pinus uncinata stands

José Antonio Bonet, Josu G. Alday, Maitane Erdozain, Juán Martínez de Aragón, Sergio de‐Miguel, Ángel Ponce
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pine forests represent globally distributed conifers growing in a wide range of habitats within the Mediterranean basin. One example are the high-altitude mountain pine ( Pinus uncinata ) forests in the Pyrenees, which stand out for their high fungal sporocarps richness. Nevertheless, studies on the effects of forest management on sporocarps diversity in mountain pine forests have been lacking, despite their importance for optimizing multiple-use forestry practices. To address this gap, we analysed the impact of different thinning intensities on fungal sporocarp diversity and composition in P. uncinata stands in the Pyrenees. The experimental design involved a BACI approach used to compare annual sporocarp diversity and composition five years before and three years after the thinning intervention in 18 permanent plots (9 thinned and 9 control). The results indicated an absence of a thinning effect in the lighter thinning intensities (< 25 % of basal area removal) for the sporocarp richness, while negative effects emerged steadily when increasing the thinning intensity until a clear negative effect reported when removing more than 70 % of the basal area. Sporocarp evenness and Shannon index revealed a negative effect due to forest thinning, with a dominance of some species that can cope with the new stand conditions. The ECM sporocarp composition was mainly affected by interannual variability, while the saprotrophic sporocarp composition was mainly driven by site conditions. However, in both guilds, we detected a reduction of the sporocarps fructification in the higher thinning intensities. Our results indicate that lighter thinning intensities do not compromise fungal diversity conservation. Finally, forest management practices that balance timber production and fungal diversity could create opportunities to enhance the ecological, social and economic value of these forest stands, which have historically been managed exclusively for timber purposes. • Clearcuts decreased sporocarp diversity in mountain pine forests. • Lighter thinning coexisted with fungal sporocarp diversity and composition. • ECM sporocarp composition was driven by interannual variability. • Saprotrophic sporocarp composition responded to local site conditions. • Lighter thinning intensities do not conflict with the conservation of fungi.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 576
Universitat de Lleida (ES), Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Regional Development Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.