Foraging habitat locations of flatback (Natator depressus) and olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) in northern Australia

Context Understanding the spatial ecology of endangered species is important for their management. With flatback turtles (Natator depressus) Vulnerable and the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) Endangered under Australia’s EPBC Act 1999, it is important to understand their movement activity to assess exposure to threats better and appropriately manage population demographics. Aims Describe, quantify, and compare the foraging patterns of flatback turtles from the Arafura Sea genetic stock and olive ridley turtles from the eastern Gulf of Carpentaria (GoC) genetic stock. Methods Satellite telemetry was used to track post-nesting flatbacks (n = 16) and olive ridleys (n = 8) to identify foraging-activity behaviour and locations between 2013 and 2017. Key results Overall, core foraging home ranges showed considerable variability from strong site fidelity to extensive spatial movement (flatback: 1–1065 km2, olive ridley: 2–113 km2). Foraging areas for both species were identified to cross over state and international boundaries (Torres Strait, eastern GoC, western GoC, Kakadu coast, Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and the Arafura Sea within Australia and Indonesia), with nine individuals foraging in Indonesian waters and five foraging in both Indonesian and Australian waters. Conclusions Flatback and olive ridley turtles in northern Australia have a large, widespread spatial distribution with varying use levels across the space. Foraging hot spots identified in this study can improve and guide the designation of biologically important areas. Inter- and intra-specific overlaps between foraging grounds were consistent with previous research, strengthening the understanding of foraging hot spots for flatbacks and olive ridleys in Indonesia and the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. Implications This study thus emphasises the importance of area-based management to benefit highly mobile species from multiple populations and taxa, potentially from all life-cycle phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24054
Primary Topic
Turtle Biology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foraging habitat locations of flatback (Natator depressus) and olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) in northern Australia

Shane Preston, Justin S. Smith, Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes, Mark Hamann et al.
Wildlife Research
Turtle Biology and Conservation
article

Foraging habitat locations of flatback (Natator depressus) and olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) in northern Australia

Shane Preston, Justin S. Smith, Mariana M. P. B. Fuentes, Mark Hamann, Leon Booth, Takahiro Shimada, Frank Loban, Eve C. Hinchliffe, Colin J. Limpus
article en

Abstract

Context Understanding the spatial ecology of endangered species is important for their management. With flatback turtles (Natator depressus) Vulnerable and the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) Endangered under Australia’s EPBC Act 1999, it is important to understand their movement activity to assess exposure to threats better and appropriately manage population demographics. Aims Describe, quantify, and compare the foraging patterns of flatback turtles from the Arafura Sea genetic stock and olive ridley turtles from the eastern Gulf of Carpentaria (GoC) genetic stock. Methods Satellite telemetry was used to track post-nesting flatbacks (n = 16) and olive ridleys (n = 8) to identify foraging-activity behaviour and locations between 2013 and 2017. Key results Overall, core foraging home ranges showed considerable variability from strong site fidelity to extensive spatial movement (flatback: 1–1065 km2, olive ridley: 2–113 km2). Foraging areas for both species were identified to cross over state and international boundaries (Torres Strait, eastern GoC, western GoC, Kakadu coast, Joseph Bonaparte Gulf and the Arafura Sea within Australia and Indonesia), with nine individuals foraging in Indonesian waters and five foraging in both Indonesian and Australian waters. Conclusions Flatback and olive ridley turtles in northern Australia have a large, widespread spatial distribution with varying use levels across the space. Foraging hot spots identified in this study can improve and guide the designation of biologically important areas. Inter- and intra-specific overlaps between foraging grounds were consistent with previous research, strengthening the understanding of foraging hot spots for flatbacks and olive ridleys in Indonesia and the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. Implications This study thus emphasises the importance of area-based management to benefit highly mobile species from multiple populations and taxa, potentially from all life-cycle phases.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 51(12)
Florida State University (US), Department of Land Resource Management (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Human Growth Foundation (US), James Cook University (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Turtle Biology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.