The cost of sleeping sickness vector control in Yasa Bonga, a health district in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease caused by a parasite transmitted by tsetse flies, once inflicted over 30,000 annual cases and resulted in an estimated half a million deaths in the late twentieth century. An international gHAT control program has reduced cases to under 1,000 annually, encouraging the World Health Organization to target the elimination of gHAT transmission by 2030. This requires adopting innovative disease control approaches in foci where transmission persists. Since the last decade, case detection and treatment, the mainstay of controlling the disease, is supplemented by vector control using Tiny Targets, small insecticide-treated screens, which attract and kill tsetse. The advantages of Tiny Targets lie in their relatively low cost, easy deployment, and effectiveness. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), bearing 65% of the 799 gHAT cases reported globally in 2022, introduced Tiny Targets in 2015. This study estimates the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in the health district of Yasa Bonga in the DRC and identifies the main cost drivers. Economic and financial costs, collected from the provider's perspective, were used to estimate the average cost of tsetse control expressed as cost (i) per target used, (ii) per target deployed, (iii) per linear kilometre of river controlled, and (iv) per square kilometre protected by vector control. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters for results robustness. The estimated annual economic cost for protecting an area of 1,925 km2 was 120,000 USD. This translates to 5.30 USD per target used each year, 11 USD per target deployed in the field, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km2 protected. These costs in the DRC are comparable to those in other countries. The study provides valuable information for practitioners and policymakers making rational, evidence-based decisions to control gHAT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011959
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Trypanosoma species research and implications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cost of sleeping sickness vector control in Yasa Bonga, a health district in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Rian Snijders, Alexandra Shaw, Iñaki Tirados, Erick Mwamba Miaka et al.
1 citations
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Trypanosoma species research and implications
0.39
article

The cost of sleeping sickness vector control in Yasa Bonga, a health district in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Rian Snijders, Alexandra Shaw, Iñaki Tirados, Erick Mwamba Miaka, Marina Antillón, Alain Fukinsia, Richard Selby, Paul R. Bessell, Epco Hasker, Fabrizio Tediosi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease caused by a parasite transmitted by tsetse flies, once inflicted over 30,000 annual cases and resulted in an estimated half a million deaths in the late twentieth century. An international gHAT control program has reduced cases to under 1,000 annually, encouraging the World Health Organization to target the elimination of gHAT transmission by 2030. This requires adopting innovative disease control approaches in foci where transmission persists. Since the last decade, case detection and treatment, the mainstay of controlling the disease, is supplemented by vector control using Tiny Targets, small insecticide-treated screens, which attract and kill tsetse. The advantages of Tiny Targets lie in their relatively low cost, easy deployment, and effectiveness. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), bearing 65% of the 799 gHAT cases reported globally in 2022, introduced Tiny Targets in 2015. This study estimates the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in the health district of Yasa Bonga in the DRC and identifies the main cost drivers. Economic and financial costs, collected from the provider's perspective, were used to estimate the average cost of tsetse control expressed as cost (i) per target used, (ii) per target deployed, (iii) per linear kilometre of river controlled, and (iv) per square kilometre protected by vector control. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters for results robustness. The estimated annual economic cost for protecting an area of 1,925 km2 was 120,000 USD. This translates to 5.30 USD per target used each year, 11 USD per target deployed in the field, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km2 protected. These costs in the DRC are comparable to those in other countries. The study provides valuable information for practitioners and policymakers making rational, evidence-based decisions to control gHAT.

PLoS neglected tropical diseasesVol. 18(11)
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Basel (CH), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Sightsavers (GB), Programme National Multisectoriel de Lutte contre le sida (CD), Oldham Council (GB), Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, Cargill Foundation
Partnerships for the goals, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Trypanosoma species research and implications
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.