Comparative Assessment of Physical Layer Performance: ATSC 3.0 vs. 5G Broadcast in Laboratory and Field Tests

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the physical layer performance of ATSC 3.0 and 3GPP 5G Broadcast through comprehensive laboratory and field tests. The study evaluates various reception scenarios, including fixed and mobile environments and various channel conditions, such as additive white Gaussian noise and mobile channels. Key performance metrics such as threshold of visibility (ToV) and erroneous second ratio (ESR) are measured to assess the reception quality of each standard. The results demonstrate that ATSC 3.0 generally outperforms 5G Broadcast due to its advanced bit-interleaved coded modulation and time interleaving techniques, effectively mitigating burst errors in mobile channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbc.2024.3482183
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Physical Layer Performance: ATSC 3.0 vs. 5G Broadcast in Laboratory and Field Tests

Sungho Jeon, Sung-Ik Park, Sesh Simha, Seok-Ki Ahn et al.
8 citations
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
2.56
article

Comparative Assessment of Physical Layer Performance: ATSC 3.0 vs. 5G Broadcast in Laboratory and Field Tests

Sungho Jeon, Sung-Ik Park, Sesh Simha, Seok-Ki Ahn, Prashant M. Maru, Parag Naik, Sungjun Ahn, Mark Aitken, Anindya Saha, Sunhyoung Kwon
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the physical layer performance of ATSC 3.0 and 3GPP 5G Broadcast through comprehensive laboratory and field tests. The study evaluates various reception scenarios, including fixed and mobile environments and various channel conditions, such as additive white Gaussian noise and mobile channels. Key performance metrics such as threshold of visibility (ToV) and erroneous second ratio (ESR) are measured to assess the reception quality of each standard. The results demonstrate that ATSC 3.0 generally outperforms 5G Broadcast due to its advanced bit-interleaved coded modulation and time interleaving techniques, effectively mitigating burst errors in mobile channels.

IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingVol. 71(1)
Broadcom (Israel) (IL), Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR), Korea Educational Broadcasting System (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
2.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Assessment of Physical Layer Performance: ATSC 3.0 vs. 5G Broadcast in Laboratory and Field Tests — Sungho Jeon, Sung-Ik Park, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS