Comparison of Classical, Neural Network and Hybrid Models for Hysteretic Single-Tendon Catheter Kinematics

While robotic control of catheter motion can improve tip positioning accuracy, hysteresis arising from tendon friction and flexural deformation degrades kinematic modeling accuracy. In this paper, we compare the capabilities of three types of models for representing the forward and inverse kinematic maps of a clinical single-tendon cardiac catheter. Classical hysteresis models, neural networks and hybrid combinations of the two are included. Our results show that modeling accuracy is best when models are trained using motions corresponding to the anticipated clinical motions. For sinusoidal motions, recurrent neural network models provide the best performance. For point-to-point motions, however, a simple backlash model can provide comparable performance to a recurrent neural network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3504321
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Classical, Neural Network and Hybrid Models for Hysteretic Single-Tendon Catheter Kinematics

Pierre E. Dupont, Yuan Wang
2 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
0.43
article

Comparison of Classical, Neural Network and Hybrid Models for Hysteretic Single-Tendon Catheter Kinematics

Pierre E. Dupont, Yuan Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While robotic control of catheter motion can improve tip positioning accuracy, hysteresis arising from tendon friction and flexural deformation degrades kinematic modeling accuracy. In this paper, we compare the capabilities of three types of models for representing the forward and inverse kinematic maps of a clinical single-tendon cardiac catheter. Classical hysteresis models, neural networks and hybrid combinations of the two are included. Our results show that modeling accuracy is best when models are trained using motions corresponding to the anticipated clinical motions. For sinusoidal motions, recurrent neural network models provide the best performance. For point-to-point motions, however, a simple backlash model can provide comparable performance to a recurrent neural network.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 10(1)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.