Botnet defense under EU data protection law

We analyse the legal framework spanned by EU data protection law with respect to the defence against botnet-related threats. In particular, we examine what legal constraints the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (and others) impose on the processing of personal data when that processing aims at detecting botnet-related traffic. We thereby put data protection rules into perspective with current trends in European IT security regulation, specifically Directive 2022/2555/EU (NIS 2 Directive). We find that the resulting legal landscape is complex and has not yet been sufficiently explored. Our analysis provides an initial evaluation of a wide range of emerging legal issues. In particular, we consider four typical processing scenarios, such as DNS sinkholing by a public authority or sharing of cybersecurity-related personal data, and discuss some of their legal problems, linking them as thoroughly as possible to potentially relevant case law of the European Court of Justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer law & security review
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106080
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Rights Management and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Botnet defense under EU data protection law

Piotr Rataj
2 citations
Computer law & security review
Digital Rights Management and Security
1.56
article

Botnet defense under EU data protection law

Piotr Rataj
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We analyse the legal framework spanned by EU data protection law with respect to the defence against botnet-related threats. In particular, we examine what legal constraints the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (and others) impose on the processing of personal data when that processing aims at detecting botnet-related traffic. We thereby put data protection rules into perspective with current trends in European IT security regulation, specifically Directive 2022/2555/EU (NIS 2 Directive). We find that the resulting legal landscape is complex and has not yet been sufficiently explored. Our analysis provides an initial evaluation of a wide range of emerging legal issues. In particular, we consider four typical processing scenarios, such as DNS sinkholing by a public authority or sharing of cybersecurity-related personal data, and discuss some of their legal problems, linking them as thoroughly as possible to potentially relevant case law of the European Court of Justice.

Computer law & security reviewVol. 56
Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft des Saarlandes (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Rights Management and Security
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Botnet defense under EU data protection law — Piotr Rataj · Computer law & security review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS