Comparative Analysis of SWAT and HEC-HMS Models for Efficient Watershed Management

Objective: This study aims to review and compare the effectiveness of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) and HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System) models in different watershed contexts, aiming to identify the conditions under which each model performs best for sustainable water resource management. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on concepts of sustainable watershed planning and water resource management. The SWAT and HEC-HMS models are widely recognized in the literature for their robustness and applicability in hydrological simulations, commonly used for surface runoff predictions and environmental risk assessment, particularly in heterogeneous watersheds. Method: A literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published from 2019 onward that directly compared the two models. The selection of papers followed rigorous criteria of contemporaneity, methodological quality, and application in different geographical and climatic contexts. The results of these studies were analyzed and discussed comparatively. Results and Discussion: The results indicate that SWAT excels in simulating high flows and in contexts of high hydrological variability, such as in mountainous regions and humid tropical watersheds. On the other hand, HEC-HMS showed better performance in simulating low flows, particularly in scenarios with limited data availability. The discussion addresses the implications of these results for watershed management and the challenges of selecting the ideal model. Research Implications: This research provides valuable insights for watershed management, highlighting the practical implications of each model in flow prediction and disaster mitigation, such as floods and droughts. Originality/Value: The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative analysis of the SWAT and HEC-HMS models in various environmental contexts. It reinforces the importance of selecting the most suitable model for each hydrological context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n11-185
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of SWAT and HEC-HMS Models for Efficient Watershed Management

Carlos Henrique Rocha, André Ferreira, Miguel Olimpio de Paula Netto, Vitor Silva Coimbra et al.
4 citations
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.81
article

Comparative Analysis of SWAT and HEC-HMS Models for Efficient Watershed Management

Carlos Henrique Rocha, André Ferreira, Miguel Olimpio de Paula Netto, Vitor Silva Coimbra, Moises Luiz Lagarez
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to review and compare the effectiveness of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) and HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System) models in different watershed contexts, aiming to identify the conditions under which each model performs best for sustainable water resource management. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on concepts of sustainable watershed planning and water resource management. The SWAT and HEC-HMS models are widely recognized in the literature for their robustness and applicability in hydrological simulations, commonly used for surface runoff predictions and environmental risk assessment, particularly in heterogeneous watersheds. Method: A literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published from 2019 onward that directly compared the two models. The selection of papers followed rigorous criteria of contemporaneity, methodological quality, and application in different geographical and climatic contexts. The results of these studies were analyzed and discussed comparatively. Results and Discussion: The results indicate that SWAT excels in simulating high flows and in contexts of high hydrological variability, such as in mountainous regions and humid tropical watersheds. On the other hand, HEC-HMS showed better performance in simulating low flows, particularly in scenarios with limited data availability. The discussion addresses the implications of these results for watershed management and the challenges of selecting the ideal model. Research Implications: This research provides valuable insights for watershed management, highlighting the practical implications of each model in flow prediction and disaster mitigation, such as floods and droughts. Originality/Value: The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative analysis of the SWAT and HEC-HMS models in various environmental contexts. It reinforces the importance of selecting the most suitable model for each hydrological context.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 18(11)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of SWAT and HEC-HMS Models for Efficient Watershed Management — Carlos Henrique Rocha, André Ferreira, et al. · Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS