AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies

Foundation models (FMs) provide societal benefits but also amplify risks. Governments, companies, and researchers have proposed regulatory frameworks, acceptable use policies, and safety benchmarks in response. However, existing public benchmarks often define safety categories based on previous literature, intuitions, or common sense, leading to disjointed sets of categories for risks specified in recent regulations and policies, which makes it challenging to evaluate and compare FMs across these benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we introduce AIR-Bench 2024, the first AI safety benchmark aligned with emerging government regulations and company policies, following the regulation-based safety categories grounded in our AI risks study, AIR 2024. AIR 2024 decomposes 8 government regulations and 16 company policies into a four-tiered safety taxonomy with 314 granular risk categories in the lowest tier. AIR-Bench 2024 contains 5,694 diverse prompts spanning these categories, with manual curation and human auditing to ensure quality. We evaluate leading language models on AIR-Bench 2024, uncovering insights into their alignment with specified safety concerns. By bridging the gap between public benchmarks and practical AI risks, AIR-Bench 2024 provides a foundation for assessing model safety across jurisdictions, fostering the development of safer and more responsible AI systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AGI - Artificial General Intelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70777/agi.v1i1.10863
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies

Yifan Mai, Yang Yu, Percy Liang, Ruoxi Jia et al.
2 citations
AGI - Artificial General Intelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment
Risk and Safety Analysis
0.92
article

AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies

Yifan Mai, Yang Yu, Percy Liang, Ruoxi Jia, Ya Tu, Kevin Klyman, Bo Li, Yi Zeng, Dawn Song, John Tan, Minzhou Pan, Andy Zhou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Foundation models (FMs) provide societal benefits but also amplify risks. Governments, companies, and researchers have proposed regulatory frameworks, acceptable use policies, and safety benchmarks in response. However, existing public benchmarks often define safety categories based on previous literature, intuitions, or common sense, leading to disjointed sets of categories for risks specified in recent regulations and policies, which makes it challenging to evaluate and compare FMs across these benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we introduce AIR-Bench 2024, the first AI safety benchmark aligned with emerging government regulations and company policies, following the regulation-based safety categories grounded in our AI risks study, AIR 2024. AIR 2024 decomposes 8 government regulations and 16 company policies into a four-tiered safety taxonomy with 314 granular risk categories in the lowest tier. AIR-Bench 2024 contains 5,694 diverse prompts spanning these categories, with manual curation and human auditing to ensure quality. We evaluate leading language models on AIR-Bench 2024, uncovering insights into their alignment with specified safety concerns. By bridging the gap between public benchmarks and practical AI risks, AIR-Bench 2024 provides a foundation for assessing model safety across jurisdictions, fostering the development of safer and more responsible AI systems.

AGI - Artificial General Intelligence - Robotics - Safety & AlignmentVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Risk and Safety Analysis
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policies — Yifan Mai, Yang Yu, et al. · AGI - Artificial General Intelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS