The “Illusion” of Childcare Reform: The Child Care Expense Deduction, Tax Expenditures, and Social Policy

In most historical work on Canadian childcare policy, the tax system is treated as an afterthought. This article does the opposite by considering the introduction and operation of the Child Care Expense Deduction (cced), introduced in 1971, as part of the history of childcare policy and politics. The cced had a significant impact on how childcare policy unfolded in the decades following its introduction. By offering cash transfers to some working parents, and disproportionately to higher-income families, the cced helped both to reinforce the idea that childcare was a private responsibility and to subsidize the private and for-profit childcare market. Over time, supported by a growing constituency of interests who benefited from tax breaks, the tax-based approach to childcare support became entrenched. The cced was among the combination of factors that helped forestall the possibility of a universal childcare program in Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Historical Review
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/chr-2024-0060
Primary Topic
Social Policies and Family
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Illusion” of Childcare Reform: The Child Care Expense Deduction, Tax Expenditures, and Social Policy

Lisa Pasolli
Canadian Historical Review
Social Policies and Family
article

The “Illusion” of Childcare Reform: The Child Care Expense Deduction, Tax Expenditures, and Social Policy

Lisa Pasolli
article en

Abstract

In most historical work on Canadian childcare policy, the tax system is treated as an afterthought. This article does the opposite by considering the introduction and operation of the Child Care Expense Deduction (cced), introduced in 1971, as part of the history of childcare policy and politics. The cced had a significant impact on how childcare policy unfolded in the decades following its introduction. By offering cash transfers to some working parents, and disproportionately to higher-income families, the cced helped both to reinforce the idea that childcare was a private responsibility and to subsidize the private and for-profit childcare market. Over time, supported by a growing constituency of interests who benefited from tax breaks, the tax-based approach to childcare support became entrenched. The cced was among the combination of factors that helped forestall the possibility of a universal childcare program in Canada.

Canadian Historical ReviewVol. 105(4)
Queen's University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social Policies and Family
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.