Problematizing and reexamining the notion of taking another introductory-level language class atcollege

Abstract Existing literature shows that discrepancies between the expectations of students and language instructors might discourage high school students from progressing in their language learning at college. This study aims to address such discrepancies by examining students who studied Chinese in high school but were still taking an introductory-level language course at college, with the intention of declaring a minor or major in Chinese Studies at a Midwestern university in the United States. Drawing on the concept of identity and investment, a qualitative research method was employed to address the time- and context-sensitive nature of identity and investment. Data were collected from interviews and reflection journals to reveal their investment in Chinese language learning and how they coalesced their identities as Chinese language learners in high school and college. Findings show that they firmly fought against the stereotypical assumption that taking another introductory-level class at college was for an easy A, as current world language education policy and implementation rendered them voiceless in the top-down implementation process. This present study provides new insights into the connections between investment and articulation in world language education, and invites stakeholders to reevaluate the predominant emphasis placed on language proficiency in foreign language research and education.