Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?

We investigate Amazon's ability to direct user clicks to more visually prominent search results, even as quality declines with the increasing prevalence of sponsored advertising products. We analyze product results from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace search queries to estimate how a top three most clicked product's features (price and quality) and screen placement influence a user's clicks. Our econometric results show that the position of a product search result (“position bias”), adjusted for its relative prominence on the screen, strongly shapes whether a user clicks on it. Within the top five search results, where typically four are advertisements, users exhibit decreased sensitivity to a product's relevance or pricing. This allows Amazon's sponsored ads to leverage product prominence as a mechanism for rent extraction from users and producers. Regulatory frameworks might limit platforms from exploiting consumers' satisficing behaviour online, including via moderating excessive advertising in algorithmic search results. • We analyze the top-3 most clicked products from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace searches. • On average, top-3 most clicked ads are 17% more expensive and one-third less relevant than their organic counterparts. • Clicks are strongly predicted by both the visual prominence and relevance of search results. • Users are less sensitive to the relevance and price of products in the 5 most prominent spots, 4 of which are typically ads. • Amazon can steer user attention toward chosen results, extracting rents from firms now unable to capture it without paying.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Economics and Policy
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101115
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?

Ilan Strauss, Tim O’Reilly, Mariana Mazzucato, Rufus Rock
3 citations
Information Economics and Policy
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
1.32
article

Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?

Ilan Strauss, Tim O’Reilly, Mariana Mazzucato, Rufus Rock
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We investigate Amazon's ability to direct user clicks to more visually prominent search results, even as quality declines with the increasing prevalence of sponsored advertising products. We analyze product results from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace search queries to estimate how a top three most clicked product's features (price and quality) and screen placement influence a user's clicks. Our econometric results show that the position of a product search result (“position bias”), adjusted for its relative prominence on the screen, strongly shapes whether a user clicks on it. Within the top five search results, where typically four are advertisements, users exhibit decreased sensitivity to a product's relevance or pricing. This allows Amazon's sponsored ads to leverage product prominence as a mechanism for rent extraction from users and producers. Regulatory frameworks might limit platforms from exploiting consumers' satisficing behaviour online, including via moderating excessive advertising in algorithmic search results. • We analyze the top-3 most clicked products from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace searches. • On average, top-3 most clicked ads are 17% more expensive and one-third less relevant than their organic counterparts. • Clicks are strongly predicted by both the visual prominence and relevance of search results. • Users are less sensitive to the relevance and price of products in the 5 most prominent spots, 4 of which are typically ads. • Amazon can steer user attention toward chosen results, extracting rents from firms now unable to capture it without paying.

Information Economics and PolicyVol. 69
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases? — Ilan Strauss, Tim O’Reilly, et al. · Information Economics and Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS